1990 (8) TMI 54 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Interpretation of the first proviso to section 40A(5)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Allowance of weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act.

Analysis:
The judgment by the Kerala High Court, delivered by Justice K. S. PARIPOORNAN, involved two connected cases concerning the interpretation of the first proviso to section 40A(5)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the allowance of weighted deduction under section 35B of the Act. The cases revolved around the assessee, a company dealing in tea and spices, and its whole-time director's salary and perquisites for the assessment years 1977-78 and 1979-80. The Income-tax Officer had invoked section 40A(5) to restrict certain expenses, leading to disputes and appeals.

For the assessment year 1977-78, the Income-tax Officer disallowed a portion of the director's salary and perquisites, which was upheld in subsequent appeals. The Appellate Tribunal followed previous decisions of the court and confirmed the disallowance. The first proviso to section 40A(5)(a) was a central issue in determining the allowable deductions for the director's remuneration.

Similarly, for the assessment year 1979-80, the Income-tax Officer disallowed a portion of the director's salary and perquisites, which was also confirmed in appeals. The Appellate Tribunal allowed weighted deduction only on specific expenses related to export activities, not on all claimed items. The Tribunal's decision was challenged, leading to the reference of legal questions to the High Court for consideration.

The court examined previous decisions, including those of other High Courts, and concluded that the decisions in Travancore Rayons Ltd. cases were applicable to the present cases. The court held that the decisions did not require reconsideration and upheld the Tribunal's decision, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee on the issues related to the first proviso to section 40A(5)(a).

Regarding the weighted deduction under section 35B of the Act, the court found that the items claimed by the assessee did not fall within the language of the provision. Therefore, the court held that the assessee was not entitled to a deduction on the cost of cartons themselves, affirming the Tribunal's decision.

In conclusion, the court answered the legal questions in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee in both cases, disposing of the income-tax referred cases accordingly. A copy of the judgment was to be forwarded to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench for further action.