9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2014 (10) TMI 31 - AT - Service TaxCenvat credit - Goods Transport Agency Services - Reverse Charge mechanism - Held that - even though the person is not providing service but is paying service tax as per law on reverse charge basis, by the fiction of law the service on which he is discharging service tax shall be deemed to be output service . In the present case also the respondent, since they discharged the service tax on GTA service, the said GTA service became an output service . - Rule 3(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 provides the manner of utilisation of the cenvat credit availed by an assessee - From the above provision for utilisation of Cenvat credit, it provides, amongst others, the Cenvat credit can be utilised for payment of service tax on output service. As discussed in above para the GTA service though received by the respondent but paid service tax thereoupon, the said GTA service is an output service . Therefore the utilisation of Cenvat credit for payment of service tax on GTA made by the respondent is legal and correct - following the Hon ble Punjab & Haryana High Court judgment in Nahar Industrial case 2010 (5) TMI 608 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT held that prior to 01.03.2008 the payment of service tax on GTA by utilising Cenvat credit is legal - Decided against Revenue.
Issues:
Whether the Respondent can utilize Cenvat credit for service tax on Goods Transport Agency Services on reverse charge basis from June 2007 to November 2007. Analysis: The appeal was filed by the Appellant (Revenue) against the Order-in-Appeal set aside by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai Zone-II. The primary issue revolved around the entitlement of the Respondent to use Cenvat credit for paying service tax on Goods Transport Agency Services under reverse charge mechanism during the specified period. The Appellant's representative reiterated the grounds of appeal, while the Respondent's counsel argued that the service tax paid on reverse charge basis falls under the definition of 'output service' as per Rule 2(p) and can be covered under Rule 3(4)(e) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal considered the submissions from both sides and analyzed the relevant legal provisions. The explanation under Rule 2(p) clarified that even if a person is not providing service but is paying service tax, the service on which tax is paid shall be deemed as 'output service.' The Tribunal also referred to Rule 3(4) which allows for the utilization of Cenvat credit for payment of service tax on output services. Since the Respondent paid service tax on Goods Transport Agency Services, it was deemed as an 'output service,' making the utilization of Cenvat credit legal and correct. Moreover, the Tribunal cited a Larger Bench judgment in a similar case which confirmed the legality of utilizing Cenvat credit for service tax payment on Goods Transport Agency Services. The judgment referenced decisions from various High Courts that supported the view that there is no legal restriction on using Cenvat credit for service tax payment on such services. The Tribunal concluded that prior to March 1, 2008, there was no bar on utilizing Cenvat credit for service tax payment, as affirmed by the Larger Bench and High Court decisions. Based on the settled legal position and precedents, the Tribunal found no fault in the Commissioner's order and upheld the decision. Consequently, the Appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed, affirming the legality of utilizing Cenvat credit for service tax on Goods Transport Agency Services under reverse charge mechanism during the specified period.
|
