2017 (8) TMI 58 - AT - Central Excise

Document to seek appeal - communication dated 8.5.2006 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Panvel - Held that - Perusal of these documents throws light that the appellant failed to provide respective details following the authority returned the claim. Appellant is directed not to multiply the litigation but provide relevant information called for by communication dated 8.5.2006 within four weeks of receipt of this order and plead its defence in any controversy - Learned authority considering the relevant details and pleadings of the appellant shall examine evidence and pass appropriate order - appeal is remanded to the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Panvel Divison - appeal allowed by remand.

Summary

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI remanded an appeal to the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Panvel Division as the appellant failed to provide relevant details following a communication dated 8.5.2006. The appellant is directed to provide the information within four weeks and plead its defense. The appeal was dismissed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) earlier.