9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: The judgment addresses four questions referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, regarding deductions, assessment of income, penalty, and appeal against interest under various tax laws.
Question 1: The Tribunal allowed deduction of a liability incurred by the assessee for damages under section 14(b) of the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952. The court noted that this question was similar to a previous decision and ruled in favor of the department. Question 2: The issue was whether an amount received as subsidy from the export promotion fund should be assessed as the assessee's income. The court examined relevant facts and legal precedents, including decisions from Calcutta, Bombay, and Madras High Courts. Despite the absence of a specific provision in the relevant assessment year, the court held that the amount received was indeed the assessee's income. Question 3: The Tribunal had to decide if a penalty levied under the Central Sales Tax Act could be allowed as a deduction while computing the assessee's income. The court referred to previous decisions and ruled in favor of the department. Question 4: The Tribunal considered the competency of an appeal against the levy of interest under section 215 of the Income-tax Act. The court confirmed the Tribunal's decision that such an appeal was not competent, siding with the department. The judgment provides detailed analysis of each question, citing legal principles and precedents to support the conclusions reached by the court. The court's rulings were consistent with previous decisions and interpretations of relevant tax laws.
|
