Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2022 (10) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (10) TMI 864 - AAR - GST


Issues:
1. Interpretation of the geographical limit of Hyderabad as per Notification No.3 of 2019 - GST Rate.

Analysis:
The case involved an application filed by M/s. Sandheera Infratech Private Limited seeking clarification on the geographical limit of Hyderabad as per Notification No.3 of 2019 under GST. The applicant, engaged in the construction of residential apartments, expressed confusion regarding the mentioned geographical limit. The Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana, noted that the queries raised by the applicant fell within the ambit of Section 97 of the GST Act. The applicant had paid the requisite fee for Advance Ruling and confirmed that the questions raised were not previously decided by any authority. Consequently, the application was admitted for further consideration.

During the personal hearing, the authorized representatives of the applicant reiterated their stance as presented in the application and requested a favorable ruling. However, the Authority emphasized that under Section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017, the questions for advance ruling must pertain to specific categories, such as classification of goods or services, applicability of notifications, determination of tax liability, among others. As the applicant's query did not align with any of the specified categories, the application was ultimately rejected on these grounds.

In conclusion, the Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana, dismissed the application from M/s. Sandheera Infratech Private Limited concerning the interpretation of the geographical limit of Hyderabad as per Notification No.3 of 2019 - GST Rate. The rejection was based on the application's failure to fall under the prescribed categories for advance rulings as stipulated in Section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017. Despite the applicant's genuine need for clarification, the Authority's decision was guided by the statutory provisions governing advance rulings under the GST Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates