9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved: Eligibility of import of goods under OGL, classification of goods as consumer goods, applicability of specific serial numbers in the Import Export Policy, interpretation of relevant appendices and lists, and the conditions for import under OGL.
Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Eligibility of Import of Goods under OGL: The primary issue in this appeal is the eligibility of importing goods described as 'Headworks High Flow with Red Bottom made of Brass' under the Open General Licence (OGL). The appellants, manufacturers of water taps/mixers, sought clearance of these goods as components/parts covered by Appendix 6, Serial No. 1 of the 1985-88 Import Export Policy. The department, however, contended that these items are consumer goods falling under Sl. No. 121 of Appendix 2B of the Policy, requiring a valid license. 2. Classification of Goods as Consumer Goods: The Adjudicating Authority held that the items were finished goods, merely needing insertion inside the tap for use, and available in any sanitary shop, thus satisfying human needs directly and falling within the ambit of Appendix 2B, Sl. No. 121. Consequently, the goods were confiscated in the absence of a license, with an option of redemption on payment of a fine of Rs. 1 lakh and a personal penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on the appellants. The lower Appellate Authority confirmed this finding, asserting that dismantling or dis-assembling consumer goods does not change their classification as consumer goods. 3. Interpretation of Consumer Goods: The appellants argued that the Headworks are only components of water taps used by them in manufacturing water taps and cannot satisfy human needs without further processing. They cited the Calcutta High Court decision in Trident Television Pvt. Ltd. v. Collector of Customs, which held that consumer goods, for the purpose of the Import Policy, are those that can directly satisfy human needs without further processing. The Tribunal in Kumar Associates v. Collector of Customs also held that sub-assemblies requiring further processing are not consumer goods. The Tribunal agreed with this interpretation, holding that the imported items are not consumer goods as they require further fitting into water taps. 4. Applicability of Specific Serial Numbers in the Import Export Policy: The department argued that the items fall under Sl. No. 517 of Appendix 3 Part A, which covers hardware and pipe fittings, and are thus excluded from Appendix 6. However, the Tribunal found that the headwork in question is neither a pipe fitting nor hardware, as defined in the New Webster's Dictionary, which covers finished articles and not components. 5. Conditions for Import under OGL: A critical point raised was whether the items must fall within List 8, Part I or Part II of Appendix 6 to be imported under OGL. The Tribunal examined the paramount legislation, the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947, and relevant statutory notifications. It concluded that there is no stipulation requiring items to separately appear in Appendix 6, List 8, Part I or Part II, apart from not appearing in Appendices 2, 3, 5, and 8. 6. Conclusion: The Tribunal held that the import of the items in dispute is covered by OGL, as the conditions for import under OGL are satisfied, and there is no additional requirement for the items to fall within List 8, Part I or Part II of Appendix 6. The goods in question are entitled to clearance under OGL as components/parts covered by Sl. No. 1 of Appendix 6 of the 1985-88 Policy. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief to the appellants.
|
