9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Classification of imported goods under sub-heading 8208.20 or 9806, applicability of Notification No. 154/86, and interpretation of Tribunal's previous decisions.
In this case, the appellants, who are manufacturers of plywood, imported "Peeling Knives" for wood peeling machines. The dispute arose when the customs authorities classified the knives under sub-heading 9806 as "parts of machinery" instead of sub-heading 8208.20 as declared by the appellants. The appellants claimed a refund based on the classification under sub-heading 8208.20 with lower duty rates per Notification No. 154/86. The Assistant Collector rejected the refund claim, leading to an appeal before the Collector of Customs (Appeals), Madras, who also dismissed the appeal. The main argument presented by the appellants was that the "wood peeling knives" should be classified under sub-heading 8208.20 as they are designed exclusively for use with wood working machines falling under Chapter Heading 84.65. The appellants contended that the duty rates applicable to goods under Heading 82.08 should be the same as those under Heading 84.65, as per Notification No. 154/86-Cus. On the other hand, the respondents relied on a Tribunal precedent in Gujarat Steel Tubes Industries v. Collector of Customs, Bombay, where it was held that interchangeable tools usable as parts of machinery under Chapter 84 were classifiable under Heading 98.06. Upon examination of the case records and submissions from both parties, the Tribunal referred to the precedent set in Gujarat Steel Tubes Industries case, where it was established that parts of machinery under Chapter 84 are classified under Heading 98.06. The Tribunal concluded that even though the knives could be considered "tools" under Chapter 82 for the purpose of Notification No. 69/87-Cus., they were excluded from the notification's benefit. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the classification of the "wood peeling knives" under sub-heading 9806, in line with the previous Tribunal decision, and rejected the appeal filed by the appellants.
|
