9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Delay in filing supplementary claims under Rule 15 of Duty Drawback Rules, 1995. Analysis: The appellants appealed against the Collector's order rejecting their supplementary claims as time-barred under Rule 15 of the Duty Drawback Rules, 1995. The issue revolved around whether the delay in filing the supplementary claims could be condoned as per the rules. The Commissioner had rejected the claims, stating that the reasons provided were insufficient to warrant condonation, leading to the claims being deemed time-barred. Upon hearing both parties, it was revealed that the consignments of leather jackets were exported via two shipping bills dated 20-7-1998. The appellants discovered discrepancies in their bank statement in May' 99, leading them to approach Customs authorities in May' 99 regarding the non-debit of certain amounts under the EDI system. Despite subsequent reminders, the claims were rejected as time-barred due to being filed after the stipulated three-month period. The Commissioner upheld this decision after a hearing on 25-11-1999. During the proceedings, the appellants requested the production of original claim documents to clarify the status of the claims. The Customs authorities failed to provide these documents promptly, causing delays in the resolution of the matter. The Tribunal noted discrepancies in the handling of the original claim and the rejection of the supplementary claims, questioning the justification for deeming the claims as supplementary and time-barred. The Tribunal found the rejection of the claims unjust, emphasizing the denial of natural justice and the undue delay in resolving the matter. In light of the findings, the Tribunal set aside the Collector's order and directed the Customs authorities to grant the claims in accordance with the law. The appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellants and highlighting the importance of fair adjudication and timely resolution of claims in customs matters.
|
