Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + HC Central Excise - 2007 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2007 (7) TMI 6 - HC - Central Excise


  1. 2024 (6) TMI 1108 - HC
  2. 2018 (8) TMI 1232 - HC
  3. 2017 (8) TMI 591 - HC
  4. 2014 (10) TMI 483 - HC
  5. 2012 (10) TMI 226 - HC
  6. 2009 (8) TMI 47 - HC
  7. 2007 (12) TMI 215 - HC
  8. 2007 (7) TMI 186 - HC
  9. 2024 (11) TMI 530 - AT
  10. 2024 (8) TMI 846 - AT
  11. 2024 (8) TMI 397 - AT
  12. 2024 (4) TMI 816 - AT
  13. 2024 (4) TMI 370 - AT
  14. 2024 (2) TMI 669 - AT
  15. 2024 (2) TMI 306 - AT
  16. 2024 (1) TMI 451 - AT
  17. 2023 (10) TMI 594 - AT
  18. 2024 (1) TMI 721 - AT
  19. 2022 (12) TMI 561 - AT
  20. 2022 (11) TMI 1460 - AT
  21. 2020 (9) TMI 383 - AT
  22. 2020 (9) TMI 432 - AT
  23. 2020 (6) TMI 258 - AT
  24. 2020 (6) TMI 257 - AT
  25. 2020 (6) TMI 352 - AT
  26. 2020 (3) TMI 84 - AT
  27. 2020 (2) TMI 226 - AT
  28. 2020 (2) TMI 608 - AT
  29. 2019 (12) TMI 1017 - AT
  30. 2019 (10) TMI 1220 - AT
  31. 2019 (10) TMI 458 - AT
  32. 2019 (10) TMI 379 - AT
  33. 2020 (1) TMI 981 - AT
  34. 2019 (9) TMI 583 - AT
  35. 2019 (8) TMI 1302 - AT
  36. 2019 (8) TMI 386 - AT
  37. 2019 (8) TMI 336 - AT
  38. 2019 (8) TMI 322 - AT
  39. 2019 (7) TMI 1072 - AT
  40. 2019 (7) TMI 970 - AT
  41. 2019 (7) TMI 723 - AT
  42. 2019 (7) TMI 115 - AT
  43. 2019 (7) TMI 59 - AT
  44. 2019 (6) TMI 854 - AT
  45. 2019 (6) TMI 572 - AT
  46. 2020 (1) TMI 762 - AT
  47. 2019 (4) TMI 243 - AT
  48. 2019 (4) TMI 322 - AT
  49. 2019 (2) TMI 1555 - AT
  50. 2018 (12) TMI 1418 - AT
  51. 2018 (11) TMI 243 - AT
  52. 2018 (11) TMI 233 - AT
  53. 2018 (11) TMI 232 - AT
  54. 2018 (10) TMI 531 - AT
  55. 2018 (12) TMI 1470 - AT
  56. 2018 (12) TMI 863 - AT
  57. 2018 (8) TMI 1174 - AT
  58. 2018 (7) TMI 1598 - AT
  59. 2018 (8) TMI 76 - AT
  60. 2018 (5) TMI 1298 - AT
  61. 2017 (8) TMI 465 - AT
  62. 2017 (6) TMI 933 - AT
  63. 2017 (5) TMI 746 - AT
  64. 2017 (3) TMI 171 - AT
  65. 2016 (12) TMI 1457 - AT
  66. 2017 (3) TMI 368 - AT
  67. 2016 (9) TMI 539 - AT
  68. 2016 (5) TMI 840 - AT
  69. 2015 (9) TMI 1376 - AT
  70. 2015 (10) TMI 1227 - AT
  71. 2015 (10) TMI 1696 - AT
  72. 2015 (1) TMI 458 - AT
  73. 2014 (2) TMI 590 - AT
  74. 2013 (12) TMI 284 - AT
  75. 2011 (10) TMI 322 - AT
  76. 2011 (9) TMI 709 - AT
  77. 2011 (8) TMI 532 - AT
  78. 2011 (6) TMI 619 - AT
  79. 2011 (6) TMI 575 - AT
  80. 2010 (9) TMI 904 - AT
  81. 2010 (6) TMI 226 - AT
  82. 2010 (6) TMI 389 - AT
  83. 2010 (1) TMI 250 - AT
  84. 2010 (1) TMI 1047 - AT
  85. 2010 (1) TMI 494 - AT
  86. 2009 (9) TMI 71 - AT
  87. 2009 (2) TMI 197 - AT
  88. 2008 (9) TMI 519 - AT
  89. 2008 (5) TMI 99 - AT
  90. 2008 (5) TMI 96 - AT
  91. 2007 (9) TMI 210 - AT
  92. 2015 (3) TMI 1258 - Commission
  93. 2015 (1) TMI 455 - Commissioner
Issues Involved:
1. Discretion to exempt penalty under Section 11AC and interest under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
2. Justification for exemption based on the payment of evaded excise duty before the issuance of a show cause notice.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Discretion to Exempt Penalty under Section 11AC and Interest under Section 11AB
The court examined whether authorities have the discretion to exempt penalties under Section 11AC and interest under Section 11AB when confirming the demand for evaded excise duty. The relevant sections of the Central Excise Act, 1944, were scrutinized, including Sections 11A, 11AA, 11AB, and 11AC.

Penalty under Section 11AC:
- Section 11AC imposes a penalty equal to the amount of duty evaded when the non-payment or short payment of duty is due to fraud, collusion, willful mis-statement, suppression of facts, or contravention of any provisions with intent to evade duty.
- The court found no discretion for authorities to impose a penalty lower than 100% of the duty evaded, except under the proviso allowing a 25% penalty if the duty is paid within 30 days from the date of determination.
- The court referenced the judgment in Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III v/s Machino Montell (I) Ltd., which affirmed that mere payment of duty before the issuance of a show cause notice does not negate the imposition of a penalty under Section 11AC.

Interest under Section 11AB:
- Section 11AB mandates that interest is payable on the amount of duty evaded, with rates determined by the Central Government, ranging between 10% and 36% per annum.
- The court clarified that interest under Section 11AB is a civil liability, applicable irrespective of whether the non-payment or short payment of duty was innocent or mala fide.
- The court emphasized that there is no discretion to exempt the assessee from paying interest under Section 11AB, as the language of the section is unambiguous and mandatory.

Issue 2: Justification for Exemption Based on Payment Before Issuance of Show Cause Notice
The court considered whether the payment of evaded duty before the issuance of a show cause notice justifies exemption from penalties and interest.

Penalty under Section 11AC:
- The court noted that the assessee had paid the majority of the evaded duty before the issuance of the show cause notice and the balance before the notice was served.
- However, the court concluded that the payment of duty before the issuance of a show cause notice does not exempt the assessee from the penalty under Section 11AC, especially when there is a finding of fraud, collusion, or willful mis-statement.
- The court upheld the finding of the Commissioner (Appeals) that there was no evidence of mala fide intention or suppression of facts by the assessee, and thus, the penalty under Section 11AC was not imposable.

Interest under Section 11AB:
- The court examined the argument that no interest is payable if the duty is paid before the issuance of a show cause notice, referencing the Tribunal's decision in Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. v/s Commissioner of Central Excise, Visakhapatnam.
- The court distinguished between the civil liability of interest and the penal nature of the penalty, asserting that interest under Section 11AB is mandatory and not subject to the same considerations as penalties under Section 11AC.
- The court concluded that interest under Section 11AB is payable even if the duty is paid before the issuance of a show cause notice, as it compensates for the delay in payment of duty to the government.

Conclusion:
The court held that:
1. There is no discretion to exempt penalties under Section 11AC, except as provided under the proviso for a reduced penalty if the duty is paid within 30 days of determination.
2. Interest under Section 11AB is a mandatory civil liability and is payable irrespective of whether the duty is paid before the issuance of a show cause notice.
3. The appeal was partly allowed, restoring the order of the Joint Commissioner regarding the imposition of interest under Section 11AB.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates