Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2025 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2025 (1) TMI 198 - HC - GST


In the High Court of Orissa, the case involved petitioner Ms. Itishree Tripathy challenging an order dated June 24, 2022. The petitioner sought an opportunity for a hearing after being permitted to file a reply to a show-cause notice dated August 16, 2021, which she could not file earlier due to COVID-19 and other reasons. The revenue, represented by Mr. Choudhury Satyajit Mishra, opposed the writ petition, arguing that the petitioner had not availed the effective, alternative statutory remedy within the prescribed period, and thus the petition was filed more than two years after the impugned order.

Ms. Tripathy highlighted that the impugned order was based on information from her client's income tax return for the financial year 2016-17, involving a sum of Rs. 94,96,605/- received for electrical works. She cited a notification from March 17, 2012, to argue that the taxable value of works contracts should exclude the value of transferred property in goods and taxes replaced by the Goods and Services Tax and allied Acts of 2017.

The court, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arindam Sinha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.S. Sahoo, directed the revenue to accept the petitioner's reply to the show-cause notice if submitted by September 11, 2024, along with a copy of the order. The revenue was instructed to consider the reply and issue a new order, setting aside the impugned order. However, if the reply is not submitted as directed, the impugned order will be automatically restored. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates