Acceptance of Electronic mode of Payment: Clause 64 and Clause 187 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. Section 269SU of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Clause 64 Facilitating payments in electronic modes. - Income Tax Bill, 2025

Clause 64 Facilitating payments in electronic modes. Income Tax Bill, 2025 Introduction In recent years, the Indian government has increasingly emphasized the importance of digital transactions in promoting transparency and reducing tax evasion. The Income Tax Bill, 2025 , introduces several provisions aimed at facilitating electronic payments. Clause 64 and Clause 187 of this Bill are particularly noteworthy, as they mandate the acceptance of payments through prescribed electronic modes for businesses exceeding a specified turnover threshold. These provisions echo the existing Section 269SU of the Income Tax Act, 1961 . This article provides a detailed analysis of these statutory provisions, exploring their objectives, implications, and potential areas of conflict or alignment. Objective and Purpose The legislative intent behind Clause 64 and Clause 187 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 , as well as Section 269SU of the Income Tax Act, 1961 , is to promote digital transactions and ensure that businesses provide adequate facilities for electronic payments. This move is part of a broader governmental strategy to curb tax evasion and enhance financial transparency. By mandating electronic payment modes, the government aims to create a more accountable and traceable business environment. Detailed Analysis Clause 64 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Clause 64 mandates that any person carrying on business with total sales, turnover, or gross receipts exceeding fifty crore rupees in the preceding tax year must provide facilities for accepting payments through prescribed electronic methods. This requirement is in addition to any other electronic payment methods already offered by the business. The clause is designed to ensure that businesses of a certain scale are equipped to handle digital transactions efficiently, thereby promoting a cashless economy. Clause 187 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Similar to Clause 64 , Clause 187 stipulates that every person carrying on business with total sales, turnover, or gross receipts exceeding fifty crore rupees during the immediately preceding tax year must provide facilities for accepting payments through prescribed electronic modes. It emphasizes the necessity for businesses to adopt prescribed electronic methods in addition to other electronic modes they may already offer. The clause underscores the government s commitment to integrating digital payment systems into the mainstream business operations. Section 269SU of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269SU , inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 , requires every person carrying on business with total sales, turnover, or gross receipts exceeding fifty crore rupees in the preceding previous year to provide facilities for accepting payments through prescribed electronic modes. This provision was introduced to counteract tax evasion by ensuring that high-turnover businesses facilitate digital transactions, thus creating a verifiable record of their financial activities. Practical Implications The introduction of these provisions has significant implications for businesses, regulators, and the broader economy. Businesses with substantial turnovers are required to invest in infrastructure that supports prescribed electronic payment modes. This could involve upgrading existing systems or adopting new technologies. For regulators, these provisions facilitate better monitoring of financial transactions, aiding in the detection and prevention of tax evasion. For the economy, the shift towards digital payments is expected to enhance financial inclusion and reduce the reliance on cash transactions. Comparative Analysis Clause 64 and Clause 187 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 , and Section 269SU of the Income Tax Act, 1961 , share a common objective: promoting electronic payments among high-turnover businesses. However, there are subtle differences in their wording and scope. While Clause 64 and Clause 187 are part of a broader legislative update, Section 269SU has been in effect since 2019, providing a foundation for the newer provisions. The primary difference lies in the legislative context and the potential for updated compliance requirements under the new Bill. Conclusion Clause 64 and Clause 187 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 , alongside Section 269SU of the Income Tax Act, 1961 , represent a concerted effort by the Indian government to integrate digital payments into mainstream business operations. These provisions are crucial for enhancing transparency, reducing tax evasion, and promoting a cashless economy. As businesses adapt to these requirements, it is essential for policymakers to provide clear guidelines and support to facilitate compliance. Future developments may include further refinements to these provisions to address any emerging challenges or ambiguities. Full Text : Clause 64 Facilitating payments in electronic modes.