Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Service Tax This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

Payment of Servcie Tax on Notice pay recovery by employer., Service Tax

Issue Id: - 107807
Dated: 4-1-2015
By:- Ashwin Garg

Payment of Servcie Tax on Notice pay recovery by employer.


  • Contents

Sir,

As per letter of appointment, employees has to serve three (3) month notice period incase of resignation but if they do not serve entire three (3) months period, then the employer company deduct as "notice pay recovery" equal to three (3) months basic salary or basic salary for balance period from full and final settlement of employee.

querry :

1) Whether employer company need to pay service tax on notice pay recovery ?

2) Whether the notice pay amount so recovered will be treated as including Service Tax or Excluding Service Tax ?

3) Whether the employer company need to raise an Invoice to resigned employee ?

4) Under which head the employer company should deposit Service Tax?

5) Under which category the service should be incorporated in Service Tax Registration Certificate ?

Thanks in advance.

Ashwin Garg

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 14 of 14 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 5-1-2015
By:- PAWAN KUMAR

dear sir,

as per my view, no service tax is liable on such recovery, as no service involve.


2 Dated: 5-1-2015
By:- MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN

As told by Mr. Pawan Kumar question of service and service tax do not arise.


3 Dated: 5-1-2015
By:- Akash Deep

Dear Sir,

at the most your transaction may be coveredunder section 66E(e) i.e. agreeing to the obligation to refrain from an act or to tolerate an act or situation or to do an act. However, to fall under this, act has to be an stand alone act. it must not be an act which is an aftermath of another contract between parties. Exercise of rights by a party arising out of contract in the event of default by other party can not be treated as an independent Act.

Further, deducting money as penalty can never be equivalent to consideration received in the event of provision of a service.

transactions is not a service.

Akash deep


4 Dated: 5-1-2015
By:- Pradeep Khatri

Dear Ashwin,

No service tax would be applicable on the transactions where employee relationship do exist.

Regards,

Neelam Taneja (Executive Consultants)

YAGAY and SUN

(Management, Business and Indirect Tax Consultants)


5 Dated: 6-1-2015
By:- Ashok Patil

No employer - employee relationship exists on termination of employment contract and tolerating an act of breach of contract will fall under declared services u/s 66E(e), as such service tax will be applicable.


6 Dated: 6-1-2015
By:- PAWAN KUMAR

Dear Sir,

As per my view :

1. In the instant case no activity involved, as no service as per clause 44 of 65B. therefore no liability of service tax.

2.This is only an transaction relatable to money or actionable claim.

3. The same is covered under the provision of service by an employee to the employer in the course of or in relation to his employment.

4.It will never cover under section 66(E)(e).

No service tax is leviable on such notice pay amount.


7 Dated: 6-1-2015
By:- Ashok Patil

Please refer the definition of Service which has two parts –

  • Any activity carried out by a person for another for consideration and
  • Includes a declared service

It implies that the declared services may or may not involve any activity as such still those services will fall under the tax net.

Also, as I already mentioned above, on termination of employment of service by whatever reason, no employer – employee relations exists as such any compensation as an obligation to tolerate an act or a situation will be covered under the declared services.


8 Dated: 7-1-2015
By:- Pradeep Khatri

Dear All,

Please go through this draft circular and thanks to God that it is still a draft circular and has not become the law

F. No.354/127/2012-TRU.

Hence, no service tax.

Neelam Taneja, (Executive Consultant)

YAGAY and SUN

Management, Business and Indirect Tax Consultants)


9 Dated: 7-1-2015
By:- Naveed S

Hi All,

It is a fact that one of the ingredients for the service tax payment is that an activity should have been provided for a consideration. Where the employees pays for such services or where the amount is deducted from the salary or a portion of the salary foregone by the employee – Such activity will also be considered as having been made for a consideration and thus liable for tax.

As per the new service tax law post negative era, services provided by an Employee to Employer is exempt, however service provided by Employer to Employee is taxable and service tax liable to be paid.

In the current situation, it is deemed to be a service provided by Employer to Employee, hence the same is taxable. It is an income in the hands of the employer and therefore employer has to pay service tax thereon.


10 Dated: 8-1-2015
By:- Ashok Patil

Perfect.........

Agree with Naveed


11 Dated: 9-1-2015
By:- MUKUND THAKKAR

well explain by naveedji.. 100%


12 Dated: 9-1-2015
By:- Naveed S

Thanks to all for the love and support.


13 Dated: 17-8-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.Ashwin Garg Ji,

Someone has asked me to comment on this issue. So my views are as under:-

I am of the view that ST is not applicable in such a situation. I concur with the experts, namely, Sh.Pawan Kumar, Sh.Akash Deep, M/s.Yagay and Sun and Sh.Govindarajan.The very much basis of recovery of three months' pay from employee by employer Co. is the upshot of 'appointment letter' issued by the Co. So relationship has not vanished. It is appointment letter and not contract.There is a gulf of difference between 'Appointment Letter' and 'Contract'. Service does not exist.Since contract not does not exist, Section 66 E (e) is not applicable to this situation.


14 Dated: 18-8-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Correction. Pl. read the word, "an offshoot' instead of 'upshot'. Offshoot is proper word here.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates