2000 (9) TMI 565

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ar, Advocate, for the Appellants. Shri Prabhat Kumar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. -  The appellants filed these appeals against the order-in-original dated 29-10-1999 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise. 2. In the impugned order, the Commissioner of Central Excise held that the process printing and slitting of cork tipping base paper into pr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s were proposed to be produced before the adjudicating authority. I have been directed to convey that since their evidence has not been relied upon the show cause notice, your request to produce them as defence witness is not acceded to." The above mentioned letter, written by the Commissioner, declined request of the appellants to produce their defence. Therefore, the impugned order is passed i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X