9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (9) TMI 1152X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... his petition has been filed by petitioner Rikhab Chand Jain seeking review of the judgment of this Court dated 14-3-2011, by which afore-noted writ petition was dismissed and order dated 7-5-1996 passed by Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Jaipur and judgment dated 23-6-2000 passed by Customs, Excise Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (for short CEGAT ), were upheld. 2. Contention o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nces, given vide order dated 7-3-2002 for release of confiscated goods. It was submitted that the matter having been decided by this Court on merits in the writ petition against the petitioner, if the petitioner was to avail the remedy under Section 482 Cr.P.C. before this Court or in a reference under Section 130A of the Customs Act before this Court. The argument about the right of the petitione ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 377; 50,000/- to ₹ 30,000/-. During the course of arguments also this argument was also agitated by the counsel for the respondent. Moreover, despite the fact that the Additional District and Sessions Judge in revision petition has set aside the direction of the Special Magistrate to return the same to the petitioner, he did not challenge such order any further and the order has become final ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
