9911796707
TMI BlogUnraveling the Intricacies: Assessing a Political Party's Claim for Income Tax ExemptionX X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 9;s Arguments The petitioner, represented by Mr. Tankha, contended the following: The AO and CIT(A) incorrectly concluded that the petitioner failed to comply with the conditions of Section 13A . The petitioner was entitled to submit the return within the extended time period prescribed u/s 139(4) , not Section 139(4B). The AO erred in concluding that the petitioner received donations exceeding INR 2,000/- in cash, violating clause (d) of the First Proviso to Section 13A . The total income was computed without considering the expenditure incurred by the petitioner. The action initiated by the respondents was actuated by mala fides. The petitioner offered to securitize the outstanding demand before the ITAT, but it was rejected. The petition ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is liable to be treated as income from other sources, and no expenditure can be allowed as a deduction. Allegation of Mala Fides The ITAT rejected the allegation of mala fides, stating that the chronology of events did not justify an inference that the recovery proceedings were conducted in undue haste. The ITAT noted that the petitioner had been remiss in taking peremptory steps regarding the outstanding demand and had sought adjournments on multiple occasions, delaying the final hearing of the appeal. Offer to Securitize the Outstanding Demand The ITAT observed that the matter did not proceed along the lines of the petitioner offering to securitize the outstanding demand. However, the court clarified that the 20% deposit mentioned in the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of stay of demand by the ITAT. The ITAT is required to consider the existence of a prima facie case, undue hardship, and the likelihood of the assessee ultimately succeeding in its challenge. The ITAT is expected to form a tentative opinion on the merits of the case while considering an application for stay. Comprehensive Summary The High Court upheld the ITAT's prima facie findings rejecting the petitioner's claim for exemption u/s 13A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 . The court found no manifest illegality in the ITAT's order, which had carefully examined the various contentions raised by the petitioner. The court observed that the petitioner had been remiss in taking timely steps to secure the outstanding demand and had sought m ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
