9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (9) TMI 1125X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eedings - Unexplained remittances in the bank account of the petitioner - as argued business account (current account) was opened in the petitioner's name in the third respondent bank without the knowledge of the petitioner - HELD THAT:- From the averments in the affidavit in support of the writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner had filed W.P. earlier. The said writ petition was dism ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... C. Kaushik, Additional Government Pleader (Tax) ORDER An assessment order dated 06.03.2024 is challenged in this writ petition. 2. The petitioner asserts that a business account (current account) was opened in the petitioner's name in the third respondent bank without the knowledge of the petitioner. According to the petitioner, the alleged escaped income of Rs.1,09,25,580/- was remitted into ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e on behalf of the first respondent and Mr. T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for the second and fourth respondents. 5. By referring to the show cause notice dated 08.12.2023, Dr. B. Ramaswamy, learned senior standing counsel, submits that credits to the extent of Rs.1,09,25,580/- and debits to the extent of Rs.51,50,000/- were made in the bank account of the pet ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt order. These are disputed questions of fact which cannot be conveniently addressed in proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. As against the assessment order, a statutory appeal is available to the petitioner. Consequently, no case is made out for interference under Article 226. 7. For reasons set out above, W.P.No.8865 of 2024 is dismissed by leaving it open to the petition ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
