9911796707
TMI Blog2005 (7) TMI 143X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iscounts. 2. The contention of the learned Counsel for the appellant with regard to the first item is that only loading charge at the factory is liable to be included and not loading charges thereafter. In support of this contention, reliance is being placed on the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Indian Oxygen Ltd. v. CCE - 1988 (36) E.L.T. 723 (S.C.). 3. As against this, the submission of the learned DR is that during the period in question, depot was liable to be treated "as place of removal" in view of the following amendment in Section 4 in 1996 :- "Place of removal" means - (i) a factory or any other place or premises of production or manufacture of the excisable goods; (ii) a warehouse or any other plac ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sessable value. Insofar as the loading charges incurred for loading the goods within the factory are concerned, they are to be included in the assessable value, irrespective of who has paid for the same but the loading expenses incurred outside the factory gate are excludible. Duty of excise is a tax on the manufacture, not a tax on the profits made by a dealer on transportation". The above ruling was rendered in the contest of assessable value being fixed at the price at the time of removal from the factory. In the present case, the place of removal has shifted to the depot in view of the amendment in 1996. Therefore, all costs, which were liable to be included earlier at the factory gate, became liable to be included at the depot. In vi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Apex Court observed as under in the case of Metal Box India Ltd., with regard to uniformity of discounts :- "13. Learned Counsel for the appellant in this connection invited our attention to the decision of the Gujarat High Court in Gujarat State Fertilizers Co. Ltd., v. Union of India Ors. - 1980 (6) Excise Law Times 397. The Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court consisting of P.D. Desai and G.T. Nanavati, JJ, interpreting the scope of Section 4 of the Act laid down that Section 4 of the Central Excise Act does not in terms enact the trade discount in order to qualify for deduction thereunder should be on a uniform basis to all wholesale purchasers at the factory gate. Any such view would require the addition of word 'uniform' befo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
