Admission of fresh evidences - Rule 29 of the ITAT Rules ...

ITAT Tribunal Can Admit New Evidence u/r 29 for Substantial Cause to Ensure Fair Decisions.

June 4, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Admission of fresh evidences - Rule 29 of the ITAT Rules categorically permits the Tribunal to allow such documents to be produced for any substantial cause. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Admission of fresh evidences - Rule 29 of the ITAT Rules ...

ITAT Tribunal Can Admit New Evidence u/r 29 for Substantial Cause to Ensure Fair Decisions.

June 4, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - genuineness and creditworthiness of the share capital subscription challenged - ITAT deleted addition - The Delhi...

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

The ITAT Jodhpur allowed admission of additional evidence u/r 46A of IT Rules by CIT(A) to delete addition on merits. The tribunal found merit in the evidence provided...

The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) considered a case involving Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustment where the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) determined the Arm's Length Price...

Keeping in view Rule 29 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 and also keeping in view the fact that the material on the basis of which the order has been...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee's appeal and admitted additional evidence. The assessee did not disclose income from other sources, which...

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer for fresh adjudication....

The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues in the case. The AO made additions based on uncorroborated documents seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that...

The HC held that the Tribunal's decision deleting the addition u/s 68 was justified as the assessee had discharged its burden of substantiating the identity,...

Power of Tribunal when it disagree with earlier decision of Tribunal - there are only two methods to disagree is either the decision is per in-curium or the decision is...

In the case before ITAT Delhi, the issue was the admissibility of additional evidence related to Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and deduction under section 54F. The...

Revision u/s 263 challenged for lack of proper inquiry by Assessing Officer regarding cash deposits during demonetization, scrap sales, and non-submission of audit...

Seizure of goods as smuggled into the country from Myanmar u/s 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The burden of proof lies on the respondent u/s 123 to show that the seized...

Rectification application u/s 254 - Admissibility and consider the additional evidence furnished by the appellant - as the appellant had admittedly filed an application...

Quick Updates: