Non-filing of RUDs with the memorandum of appeal is of no ...

Case Laws Central Excise

January 25, 2015

Non-filing of RUDs with the memorandum of appeal is of no consequence and does not amount to violation of Rule 16 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. The contention, repeatedly asserted by the ld. AR is frivolous and wholly irrelevant. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Non-filing of RUDs with the memorandum of appeal is of no ...

Case Laws Central Excise

January 25, 2015

You may also like:

Demand of duty - Appelalnt sought the grant of inspection of the investigation file and the non-relied upon documents (Non-RUDs) - appellant allowed to investigate the...

The central issue revolves around the maintainability of a single appeal filed by the Revenue against multiple Bills of Entry. As per Rule 6(A) of the CESTAT Procedure...

There is constant non-appearance of the appellant before this Tribunal - appeal is liable for dismissal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - AT

Maintainability of appeal of the assessee - threshold amount involved in the appeal - disputed amount is less than Rs.2,00,000/- - the appellant failed to appeared for...

Non compliance of Rule 16 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules 1982 - it is necessary for Registry to ensure that entire paper book with relevant documents are file within the...

One appeal filed by the Revenue against 7 Bills of Entry is not maintainable. As per Rule 6(A) of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, when the Commissioner (Appeals)...

Application for refund filed manually - Since rule 97A contains a non-obstante clause, it is intended to override rules 89 to 97 of the CGST Rules forming part of...

Scope of adjournment of matter beyond three times - Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982 - The Tribunal dismisses the appeal due to the appellant's non-prosecution,...

The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of continuing an appeal post the NCLT's approval of the resolution plan. Referring to Rule 22 of CESTAT...

Dismissal of appeal - appeals have not been filed by a person authorized under Rule 3 of Customs Appeal Rules, 1982 - Appeal filed by CHA - procedural lapse or not -...

The court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution in accordance with Rule 20 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982. The request for adjournment beyond the statutory...

The CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the appeal abates u/s Rule 22 of Custom, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Procedure Rules, 1982 due to the liquidation order by...

The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, dismissed an appeal due to abatement caused by non-prosecution of the case. The Tribunal held that adjourning a matter beyond three...

Revocation of CHA Licence - there is no provision for granting stay under Rule 41 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982 - AT

Manual filing of applications for Advance Ruling and appeals before Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling

Quick Updates: