Non-filing of RUDs with the memorandum of appeal is of no ...

Non-filing of RUDs with appeal memo doesn't breach Rule 16, CESTAT Rules 1982; argument considered frivolous.

January 25, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Non-filing of RUDs with the memorandum of appeal is of no consequence and does not amount to violation of Rule 16 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. The contention, repeatedly asserted by the ld. AR is frivolous and wholly irrelevant. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Non-filing of RUDs with the memorandum of appeal is of no ...

Non-filing of RUDs with appeal memo doesn't breach Rule 16, CESTAT Rules 1982; argument considered frivolous.

January 25, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

There is constant non-appearance of the appellant before this Tribunal - appeal is liable for dismissal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - AT

The central issue revolves around the maintainability of a single appeal filed by the Revenue against multiple Bills of Entry. As per Rule 6(A) of the CESTAT Procedure...

The court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution in accordance with Rule 20 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982. The request for adjournment beyond the statutory...

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

CESTAT rejected appeals for default under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, due to appellant's non-appearance at hearings without valid justification. Following...

Non considering the revised return filed by the assessee for rectifying the mistake in claim of depreciation - In this case, the original return was not filed under...

Time Limitation - Rejection of appeal filed by the petitioner - Physical copies being submitted on 24.04.2023, beyond the condonable period while electronic filing was...

Filing of Form 10-IE to opt for the new tax regime u/s 115BAC is directory, not mandatory. If filed before assessment, the Assessing Officer must consider it. The...

Refund of accumulated input tax credit - relevant date for the purpose of considering the limitation u/s 54 - The High Court addressed this issue by directing the...

Demand of duty - Appelalnt sought the grant of inspection of the investigation file and the non-relied upon documents (Non-RUDs) - appellant allowed to investigate the...

Best judgement assessment - GSTR returns were not filed by the petitioner within the prescribed time limit - At any cost, the right to file the returns cannot be taken...

Dismissal of appeal - appeals have not been filed by a person authorized under Rule 3 of Customs Appeal Rules, 1982 - Appeal filed by CHA - procedural lapse or not -...

Maintainability of application filed by the appellant under section 129B of the Customs Act, 1962 read with R.20 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for rectification...

State Government or not - Jaipur Development Authority - it is found from records that JDA is constituted by State Government under Jaipur Development Authority Act 1982...

Condonation of delay in filing returns - due to ill-health, returns (GSTR-3B) could not be filed within the time prescribed by the second respondent - The petitioner,...

Quick Updates: