Penalty u/s 78 - Benefit of Section 80 - he had depended on his ...

Case Laws Service Tax

November 25, 2013

Penalty u/s 78 - Benefit of Section 80 - he had depended on his accountant as he (Managing Partner) was busy pursuing his Ph.D. with since February 2007 - sufficient cause shown - penalty waived - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 78 - Benefit of Section 80 - he had depended on his ...

Case Laws Service Tax

November 25, 2013

You may also like:

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Demand in respect of firm raised in the name of Partner - In the light of the legal nature of a partnership firm, a demand raised on the managing partner can never be...

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - provisions of Section 78 having been invoked and penalty imposed, Section 76 penalty may not be justified - AT

Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

Waiver of penalty is pleaded as the penalty under Section 78 ibid has been imposed and for an option to pay 25% (reduced) mandatory penalty under Section 78 ibid as the...

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - No independent reasons have been given by the first appellate authority to confirm the penalty under Section 78 of the...

Penalty u/s 78 - failure to discharge tax - Construction services - both the authorities below have rightly imposed and upheld penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Finance Bill, 2015 - service tax - Substantial overall in levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78

Penalty u/s 78 - Simultaneous penalty u/s 76 and 78 - penalties u/s. 76 and 78 of the Finance Act are simultaneously imposable upon a assessee for the period prior to 10....

BOTH PENALTIES UNDER SECTION 76 & 78 CAN NOT BE LEVIED - Article

Penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, cannot be imposed simultaneously with penalty u/s 76 for the same offense. The decision in Nizam Sugar Factory case applies to...

Penalty u/s 78 - suppression of facts - when mandatory penalty is imposable, whether the duty is paid before issue of show cause notice or after notice cannot alter the penalty.

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - waiver of penalty u/s 80 - C&F Service - inclusion of reimbursements of expenses - there were divergent views on the issue - penalty waived - AT

Levy of penalty - There are no reason why the said benefit cannot be extended to the penalty imposed under Section 76, since both the Sections are to be read along with...

Reduction in the quantum of penalty imposed u/s 78 - Unless the penalty under Section 78 of the Act itself is leviable on the Assessee, there is no question of any...

Quick Updates: