Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2013 Year 2013 This

Unjust enrichment - during investigation appellant deposited an ...


Appellant Wins Refund of Rs.18.75 Lakh Deposited Under Protest Amidst Unjust Enrichment Dispute.

November 25, 2013

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Unjust enrichment - during investigation appellant deposited an amount of Rs.18,75,000/- under protest by debit entries in the cenvat credit account - refund allowed - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

  2. Refund claim of amount deposited during investigation - the appellant is entitled to refund with interest under Section 35 FF, for which no limitation is applicable. The...

  3. The appellant is entitled to refund of the amount deposited 'under protest' during the pendency of adjudication proceedings and investigation, as it cannot be considered...

  4. Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

  5. The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

  6. CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

  7. The case involved a refund claim for duty paid under protest, rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment. The appellant paid duty under protest and filed a refund claim...

  8. Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

  9. Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

  10. Refund of duty paid under protest – unjust enrichment is not applicable where amount deposited under protest - AT

  11. Refund claim alongwith interest - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - As from the facts itself, it is clear that the appellants were not required to pay any...

  12. Refund claim - Duty paid under protest - Doctrine of unjust enrichment - Dispute relating to classification was resolved in favor appellant assessee - The tribunal found...

  13. Refund of amount paid by the petitioner during the pendency of its appeal - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - amounts deposited in terms of Section 131 of...

  14. Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Security deposit - amount not to be credited to consumer welfare fund - appellants are eligible for refund of cash security...

  15. Refund - amount paid by the appellant under protest - the principal unjust enrichment does not apply to cases where duty has been paid to protest - unjust enrichment...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates