Appeal - The party as well as advocate were fully aware that the ...

Appeal Denied: Party and Advocate Knew April 8 Hearing Date, Advocate Present at Tribunal Morning Session.

August 6, 2011

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Appeal - The party as well as advocate were fully aware that the matter was fixed for hearing on 8th of April 2010 and in fact the advocate was very much present during the morning session in the Tribunal - Thus , the appeal that the party is penalised for absence of his advocate is rejected..... – AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appeal - The party as well as advocate were fully aware that the ...

Appeal Denied: Party and Advocate Knew April 8 Hearing Date, Advocate Present at Tribunal Morning Session.

August 6, 2011

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Withholding certificate u/s 197(1) as effective from 1st April, 2019 for Financial Year - income/profits are not chargeable to tax under Article 8 of India-UK DTAA r/w...

The assessee, a foreign airline company and tax resident of the USA, engaged in the business of operating aircraft in international traffic, obtained approval from DGCA...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Section 7 application filed by the Appellant, ruling that the share application money deposited by the Appellant with the Corporate...

Levy of penalty on additions of admitted amount during assessment proceedings - CIT(A) deleted the penalty - Company has already liquidated - when the respondent company...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - a prompt decision was taken to prefer an appeal and the communication was sent by the applicant to the advocate making a request...

The petitioner is deprived of the statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order due to the non-constitution of the Tribunal u/s 112(8) and (9) of the B.G.S.T....

Appealable order - Whether the communication would be considered as an ‘order’ for filing of appeal before the Tribunal - The Tribunal determined that the communication...

Undervaluation of goods - FOS and Sucralose when cleared to related parties and M/s Surya Herbals by not following CAS-4 valuation method as provided u/r 8 of Central...

The Appellate Tribunal found the Appellant Company guilty of contravening u/s 9(1)(a) of FERA 1973 by making payments to a person outside India without RBI permission....

Admissibility of vakalatnama filed by a new advocate in the absence of ‘no objection’ of the advocate already on record - Under no circumstance, a party can be denied of...

The Appellate Tribunal considered TP adjustment on brokerage commission received from related parties. It found TNMM method appropriate for benchmarking the commission...

Condonation of delay in filing the present appeal by 515 days - The assessee has not received any notice for hearing of the appeal as well as the order passed by the...

The NCLAT allowed the approval of the New Board's decision to collapse/unwind transactions whereby IFIN provided loans to third parties, except for certain respondents...

NCLAT dismissed appeal concerning operational creditor's Section 9 application under IBC. Court held that while Section 8 notice is mandatory prerequisite for filing...

This case deals with the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) against orders of the Telecom Disputes Settlement and...

Quick Updates: