Appealable order - Whether the communication would be considered ...

Tribunal Rules Superintendent's Communication an Appealable Order Due to Lack of Clarity on Cross-Examination Request.

May 7, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

Appealable order - Whether the communication would be considered as an ‘order’ for filing of appeal before the Tribunal - The Tribunal determined that the communication from the Superintendent was not a decision but merely conveyed the date fixed by the Commissioner. However, the Tribunal acknowledged that the appellant had a right to know why their request for cross-examination was denied, which was not clearly stated in the communication. Citing precedent, the Tribunal held that such communications could be considered as appealable orders, especially when the decision on cross-examination was neither accepted nor denied by the Commissioner. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant correctly filed the appeal before them.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appealable order - Whether the communication would be considered ...

Tribunal Rules Superintendent's Communication an Appealable Order Due to Lack of Clarity on Cross-Examination Request.

May 7, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Refund of EDD - Period of limitation - Appellant unaware of finalisation of bills of entry - The Appellate Tribunal notes that neither the original authority nor...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving contravention of section 9(1)(f)(i) of FERA 1973. The appellant argued lack of material and violation of natural...

Penalties u/s 112 and section 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 - classification of goods imported under duty exemption entitlement certificate (DEEC) scheme - The tribunal...

ITAT quashed assessment order regarding additions under section 56(1)(vii) amounting to Rs. 139.67 crores made on basis of third-party documents found during search...

The SC held that the HC has incorrectly exercised its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 in granting the respondent/claimant one more opportunity to...

Power of tribunal to review application - It is the well laid down proposition of law that ‘in the absence of any power of ‘Review’ or ‘Recall’ vested with the...

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the rejection of the petitioner's request for cross-examination in a matter...

The appellant sought stay of the impugned order citing violation of principles of natural justice due to denial of cross-examination of witnesses in quasi-judicial...

The ITAT Indore addressed unexplained cash investment for property purchase post search operation. Addition without cross-examination was challenged. The Tribunal...

Computation of capital gains enshrined in section 48 - Deduction of Brokerage expense, Transfer expenses and indexed cost of improvement - Tribunal found the assessee...

Impugned order suffers from non-application of mind, violation of principles of natural justice. Tribunal failed to consider grounds raised by petitioner for delay in...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for under reporting income - defective notice - The Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument, emphasizing that the AO did not apply his mind...

Method of communication of notice - The High Court examined the provisions of Section 282(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 127(1) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962...

The Tribunal addressed various issues related to transfer pricing adjustments, including the selection of comparables, interest on trade receivables, and set-off of...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

Quick Updates: