Suppression of facts - when there are divergent views of ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 14, 2014

Suppression of facts - when there are divergent views of tribunal / HC on a legal issue, the mala fide intention cannot be attributed to the assessee so as to invoke the longer period of limitation. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Suppression of facts - when there are divergent views of ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 14, 2014

You may also like:

Extended period of limitation - suppression of facts or not - it is not only the larger bench decision which settled the law law but there were contrary circulars of the...

Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - mala fide intention - the corporate applicant filed the application with mala fide intention and with ulterior motive for...

Levy of service tax - reimbursable expenses - appellant charge 10% of the actual wages - if on any issue there is a legal dispute which involved interpretation of law...

Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

Invocation of extended period of limitation under proviso to section 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994 requires wilful suppression of facts with intent to evade service tax...

Penalty - Area based exemption - when there are divergent views of the higher authorities on the issue and assessees act on the basis of said views, therefore cannot be...

Institutional Mechanism for Forming Departmental View on Contentious Legal Issues - Order-Instruction

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - An order in the name of dead person - The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged that the penalty order was indeed issued in the name of a deceased...

Extended Period of limitation - Revenue Neutrality - The issue involved is also of pure interpretation of provisions of levy of duty including profit in assessable value...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed issues regarding the method of valuation of electrical motors, whether to apply Rule 8 or Rule 4 of the Central Excise (Valuation)...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - “sufficient cause or reason” of delay - If the negligence or omission is a by-product of a deliberate attempt with mala fide...

Commissioner failed to follow binding Tribunal precedents on classification of bio-fungicides and bio-insecticides, erroneously believing Supreme Court appeals left...

Clandestine manufacture and recovery of Central Excise Duty along with interest and penalty - suppression of facts and misrepresentation alleged against petitioner -...

CENVAT Credit - Rule 9(1)(bb) - duty paying invoices - it is clear that the department has accepted that there is no suppression of facts. To establish suppression of...

The case pertains to the classification of services provided by M/s Intelsat to the respondent as either 'Telecommunication Services' or 'Support Services for Business...

Quick Updates: