Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2015 Year 2015 This

Clandestine removal of goods - the non-recording of the correct ...


Assessee's Failure to Record Correct Quantity in RG.1 Register Leads to Duty Demand for Excise Violation.

March 26, 2015

Case Laws     Central Excise     HC

Clandestine removal of goods - the non-recording of the correct quantity of goods in the statutory record, viz., RG.1 register maintained by the assessee establishes the case for demand of duty, more so in a case of statement accepting Central Excise violation - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Confiscation of goods - Excess stock found which was not recorded in RG-1 Register - search was conducted as on 10/3/2011 - RG-1 Register was updated only till 28/2/2011...

  2. Demand - duty on difference between finished goods reported in their 3CD returns and the RG-1 daily stock account - less quantity of clearance has been shown in their...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure on the part of legal heir of the deceased assessee to explain the source of part of the deposits - The mere failure on the part of the...

  4. Duty demand - Discrepancy in RG-1 Register - Shortage in goods - charges of clandestine activities are required to be upheld on the basis of sufficient cogent reasons...

  5. Records maintained by a registered Central Excise Manufacturer / Dealer - Article

  6. Penalty u/s 11AC - Shortage of finished product vis-a-vis balance recorded in the RG-1 register – the appellant having sufficient balance in the RG-23A register, cannot...

  7. Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

  8. Interpretation of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding the recovery of amounts collected as excise duty but not deposited with the government. The key...

  9. Rate of duty of excise increased from 10% to 12% and 1% to 2%

  10. Demand of duty (CVD & SAD) foregone at the time of import - The quantity of imported Sulphur, which was not used in manufacture of fertilizer - the said clearances of...

  11. The appellant's contention regarding shortage of work-in-progress (WIP) due to dust generated during manufacturing was rejected. The logical conclusion was that final...

  12. The appellant paid excise duty on the removal of inputs as such, based on the transaction value. However, this excise duty was found to be in excess of the actual CENVAT...

  13. Demand u/s 201(1) - assessee in default - Period of limitation - the limitation prescribed for passing orders under Section 201(1) of the Act deeming a person to be an...

  14. Clandestine Removal - Goods not accounted in RG-1 Register - It is settled legal position that the demand cannot be worked on the basis of mere meter readings or power...

  15. CESTAT Mumbai addressed a case involving a differential Central Excise duty demand u/s 11A(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant discharged the duty upon...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates