Validity of statement - Once a certain claim has been accepted ...

Taxpayer Claim Retraction Possible via Affidavit; Assessing Officer Must Investigate Further Under New Guidelines.

April 17, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Validity of statement - Once a certain claim has been accepted adverse to the interest of assessee, same can be retracted by way of deposition in affidavit and Assessing Officer ought to have made further inquiries in respect of same - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of statement - Once a certain claim has been accepted ...

Taxpayer Claim Retraction Possible via Affidavit; Assessing Officer Must Investigate Further Under New Guidelines.

April 17, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer failed to provide findings for rejecting assessee's claim of exemption as a startup from applicability of section...

Seeking grant of bail - Director / officer who is in default - the Investigating Officer had not filed any application seeking that the petitioner be placed in judicial...

Deduction u/s.35 AD(5)(aa) - whole of capital expenditure incurred for purpose of development of hotel claimed - We restore the issue to file of the Assessing Officer...

Credit of TDS can be granted only when income corresponding to such TDS is assessed to tax in the same financial year. Assessee has the liberty to approach the Assessing...

Retraction of statement given during survey - evidentiary value of statement recorded u/s 131 - Despite the retraction, the initial findings of the CIT(A) were largely...

Impugned order set aside, matter remitted back to Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. Assessing Officer rejected claim based on Tax Audit Report not being duly...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the appellant, during reassessment proceedings, had filed their return of income but failed to provide...

Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s 68 - The Assessing Officer has taken a possible view. When the Assessing Officer follows the direction of the Ld. Pr. CIT, in his order...

Refund of CGST & SGST wrongly paid - Interpretation of the term “subsequently held” - the term “subsequently held” in section 77 of CGST Act, 2017 or under section 19 of...

Formation of belief by the Assessing Officer that income has escaped assessment is the crux of the reopening provision. The reasons recorded must be based on tangible...

Revision u/s 263 - bogus purchase - proof of nexus between the purchases and sales - once submission/reply filed by the assessee, pursuant to enquiry by the Assessing...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of the reassessment notice issued u/s 148 and the consequent order passed u/s 147 regarding the addition made by the...

Quick Updates: