Denial of refund claim - Mere pendency of appeal preferred by ...

Court Orders Refund Processing Despite Pending Appeal; Interest Set at 15% Per Tribunal's May 7, 2012, Order.

August 19, 2015

Case Laws Service Tax HC

Denial of refund claim - Mere pendency of appeal preferred by respondent/department challenging the order passed by Tribunal dated May 7, 2012 was itself no ground to delay the refund - refund to be made with interest @15% - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of refund claim - Mere pendency of appeal preferred by ...

Court Orders Refund Processing Despite Pending Appeal; Interest Set at 15% Per Tribunal's May 7, 2012, Order.

August 19, 2015

Case Laws Service Tax HC

You may also like:

The High Court addressed the issue of whether the Tribunal could uphold the refund granted by the Commissioner, despite setting aside the cost recovery charges demand....

Refund processing delayed due to technical glitches at Central Processing Center (CPC), despite Assessing Officer's order. Court expressed concern over non-payment of...

The case pertains to the refund of tax paid by the petitioner under the 'Inverted Duty Structure' in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime. The petitioner filed an...

Appeal against order filed by Resolution Professional (RP) was disposed of. Resolution Plan submitted by Appellant was approved by Committee of Creditors (CoC) on...

HC directed State Authorities to process petitioner's GST refund claim after verifying facts and entitlement. The decision stemmed from respondents' inaction despite...

Transitional credit of input tax available under VAT Act sought. State contended refund application pursuant to Annexure-P/15 required. Court held refund of Rs....

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

Refund of service tax on Ocean Freight - Precedents - Validity of order of CESTAT for non-following the decision of Non-Jurisdictional High Court, in regard to...

Doctrine of merger applied to impugned order of Appellate Tribunal imposing penalty on appellant. Held that since Supreme Court's judgment on appeal against Tribunal's...

HC dismissed writ petitions challenging revisional orders under AVAT Act and CST Act. The court found Circular No. 15/2010 inapplicable to Revisional Authority's powers....

Challenge to suspension order of State GST officer for issuing refund to a fake exporter without proper verification. Petitioner contests suspension citing lack of...

The High Court addressed the valuation of goods for calculating Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) refund. The court held that the rules do not specify considering...

Rectification u/s 154 - refund of taxes paid in foreign country - The High court noted that the Hon'ble Apex Court had expressly overruled the AAR order in a previous...

CIRP - Liability to pay transfer fee of 10% of the prevailing market value of the Kharagpur land - The court determines the validity of notices issued by the respondents...

The appellants claimed that the entire amount of service tax paid by them should be considered as a deposit u/s 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and sought a refund....

Quick Updates: