Duty demand - on the fact of such clear cut information given to ...

Duty Demand Time-Barred: 2011 Notice Invalid Due to 2006 Disclosure; No Suppression or Misstatement Proven.

November 5, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Duty demand - on the fact of such clear cut information given to the department for recredit of the amount in June 2006; the show-cause notice issued in 2011 is to be held as time barred and no suppression, misstatement is proved against the appellant. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Duty demand - on the fact of such clear cut information given to ...

Duty Demand Time-Barred: 2011 Notice Invalid Due to 2006 Disclosure; No Suppression or Misstatement Proven.

November 5, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding service tax recovery for 2011-2012. The demand for April-September 2011 was time-barred, exceeding even the extended...

Seeks to amend notifications no. 67/2006-Cus, 68/2006-Cus (both dated 30.06.2006) and 85/2011-Cus dated 06.09.2011 so as to include Afghanistan as one of the beneficiary...

Amends Notification No. 20/2006-Customs, dated the 1st March, 2006 - Ntf. No. 118/ 2011 Dated: December 29, 2011

Rescinds notification no. 78/2006-Customs, dated the 8th August, 2006 - Ntf. No. 108/2011 Dated: December 5, 2011

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

Appellant provided services of loading, unloading, shifting, and transportation of iron ore under separate contracts. CESTAT held it was a composite service for...

Suo moto availement of credit of duty - excess paid duty adjusted against short paid duty - Cause of action started from the date when the differential duty paid by the...

Determination of duty u/s 11A (2) before demanding interest –- duty was deposited before issuance of show cause notice - SCN demanding interest portion is not invalid - AT

The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

The High Court held that u/ss 28AA(1) and 28(10) of the Customs Act, there is no requirement for a demand for interest to be made in the original assessment order....

Once the resolution plan is approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, any outstanding claims, including those under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act for...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Whether the re-assessment proceedings initiated against the petitioner are barred by limitation? - The amendment made to Section 40 of the Act, cannot be construed so as...

Extended period of limitation - Mere omission to give correct information is not a suppression of fact unless it was deliberate to stop the payment of duty - entire...

Quick Updates: