Excess material found during search in the premises of Job ...

Confiscation Order Overturned: Rules 15 & 25 Not Applicable in Excess Materials Case During Premises Search.

November 27, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Excess material found during search in the premises of Job worker - provisions of Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 are not applicable to the facts of cases in hand, consequently, the confiscation of the goods in question is set aside - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Excess material found during search in the premises of Job ...

Confiscation Order Overturned: Rules 15 & 25 Not Applicable in Excess Materials Case During Premises Search.

November 27, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Power of access the premises of the assessee - Vires of Rule 5A(1) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Access to the premises is a lesser power than the power to search the...

Proceedings u/s 153A were initiated based on alleged incriminating material found during search, however, the material relied upon was a laptop recovered from Mumbai...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Physical verification of business premises in certain cases - Rule 25 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 as amended

Imposition of penalty u/r 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - Bogus invoices- the appellant has neither taken the credit, nor utilized the credit, whereas he has only...

Levy of penalty - taking CENVAT Credit irregularly - it is the contention of the Assessee that there is some element of discretion available in the adjudicating officer...

Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 regarding confiscation of raw material/semi-finished goods - Rule 25, under which the semi-finished processed goods has been...

Availment of CENVAT Credit - Non maintenance of separate account - When it is impossible to comply with the provisions of sub-rule (2) of Rule 6, it would not be...

Penalty u/r 25 or 26 of CER - Mentioning wrong rule number - The first appellate authority was not correct in holding that mentioning Rule 25 was a typographical error...

The powers vested in the officer armed with a search warrant are limited to searching the entire premises. Once the premises are searched, the search party would have to...

Waiver of Penalty under Rule 25 of the CE Rules - For default of payment of duty under Rule 8 (3A) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - no penalty can be imposed under Rule...

Additions u/s 153A solely based on a sketchy statement of an accountant u/s 132(4), which in turn is based on a confessional statement of a director in a previous...

NCLAT addressed the computation of limitation periods for filing appeals under IBC. The tribunal held that while the 30-day limitation period under Section 61 can be...

HC ruled on validity of assessment under Section 153C, clarifying that discovery of documents pertaining to third parties during search operations triggers jurisdiction,...

Authority and jurisdiction - Power to search versus Power to seal u/s 105 - it does not appear that the premises of the petitioner were not available for the purpose of...

Quick Updates: