AO initiated the penalty u/s 271E for violation of sec. 269TT, ...

AO Incorrectly Imposed Penalty Under Wrong Section; No Violation Found, No Penalty u/s 269SS.

February 8, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

AO initiated the penalty u/s 271E for violation of sec. 269TT, but levied penalty u/s 271D for violation of the provisions of sec. 269SS. From this conduct of the AO, it was clear that the Assessing Officer did not applied his mind before levying penalty - assessee has not accepted the loan or deposit in contravention of the provisions of sec. 269SS - No penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

AO initiated the penalty u/s 271E for violation of sec. 269TT, ...

AO Incorrectly Imposed Penalty Under Wrong Section; No Violation Found, No Penalty u/s 269SS.

February 8, 2016

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/s 271D for contravention of Section 269SS, which restricts cash transactions above a specified sum for immovable property. The key points are: The...

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

Penalty u/s 270A - AO has disallowed the assessee’s claim of deduction u/s 24 and Chapter-VIA deduction as false claims - The appellant contested the penalty on various...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

The summary focuses on the interpretation and applicability of Section 271D and Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act. The key points are: Section 271D imposes a penalty...

Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

AO imposed penalty under s.270A for unsubstantiated business expenses including advertising, development, land, and excavation charges, which were disallowed from...

Penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS was challenged. ITAT held that where assessee received sale consideration for immovable property in cash exceeding Rs....

Levy of penalties u/s 271D and 271E for the violation of sections 269SS and 269T, respectively - The Tribunal, after reviewing precedents from the Supreme Court and...

Levy of penalty u/s 76 - Power of Commissioner (appeals) to impose penalty - It is found that the impugned order has travelled beyond the OIO because in the OIO, the...

Imposition of penalty under Section 78 - Merely because penalty under Section 78 has been imposed for the earlier period, no penalty can be imposed for any subsequent...

The Appellate Tribunal held that for penalty u/s 270A, there must be satisfaction by the AO about concealment of income or inaccurate particulars. Citing Golden Peace...

CESTAT Chennai held that penalty u/s 114 Customs Act was not imposed on Respondents for smuggling undeclared cigarettes concealed with gypsum plaster. Penalty was...

Quick Updates: