Home Highlights May 2016 Year 2016 This

You may also like:

1. Revision application u/s 264 to get refund - application by amalgamated company - order of CIT rejecting the application is erroneous - refund allowed u/s 237 - Tri

2. Rejection application for Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - Rejection on the ground the assessee has filing an appeal u/s 246 which was rejected by the CIT(A) due...

3. Revision u/s 264 - application for revision was rejected because it was not accompanied by the requisite fee of Rs.500/- An opportunity should be given to cure the same - HC

4. Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - CIT rejected the application on the ground that, the assessee has filed application only against the order of assessment -...

5. Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - Commissioner has rejected the revision petition u/s 264 on the ground of that the Petitioner did not comply with the mandatory...

6. Revision application u/s 264 was initially rejected due to non-payment of mandatory fee of Rs. 500. However, the petitioner paid the fee immediately upon objection...

7. The petitioner incurred expenditure towards application of income as required u/s 11(1)(d) for the year under consideration, which was evident from the computation of...

8. Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - CIT rejected the application - Petitioner has not filed the revised returns u/s 139(5) of the Act but he has admitted to an...

9. Condonation of delay - revision u/s 264 - as the order u/s 143(1) came to be passed within this one year itself, writ petitioner had taken the first step to have income...

10. Revision u/s 264 - Claiming benefit of DTAA - refund of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) which was paid wrongly - This was not a case where a deduction was made u/s 195...

11. Revision u/s 264 - penalty u/s 270A imposed - waiver of penalty u/s 270AA - The very fact that the indications were made that the matter fall within (a) and (c),...

12. Revision Petition filed u/s 264 of the order passed by AO u/s 270AA(4) - The provision does not provide for any bar or prohibition against the assessee challenging an...

13. Section 264 revision application concerning long-term capital gain (LTCG) on extinguishment of shares due to loss arising from NCLT order. Petitioner's claim for loss on...

14. Revision of other orders u/s 264 - petitioners sought to expressly withdraw the revision petition filed u/s 264 - application was pending for decision - Thus by not...

15. Revision u/s 264 - computation of income from capital gains - Although, there is a detailed discussion with regard to the nature of the transaction, as to whether it is...