The removal of petitioner as Director of the company does not ...

Petitioner's Removal as Director Not Subject to Judicial Review; Cheque Authority Shift Not Mismanagement Basis.

January 9, 2017

Case Laws Companies Law Tri

The removal of petitioner as Director of the company does not stand to judicial review. Therefore, Respondent no. 2 giving cheque power to another Director in the place of petitioner by itself cannot be canvased as one of the ground in support of the plea of mismanagement.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The removal of petitioner as Director of the company does not ...

Petitioner's Removal as Director Not Subject to Judicial Review; Cheque Authority Shift Not Mismanagement Basis.

January 9, 2017

Case Laws Companies Law Tri

You may also like:

Dishonour of Cheque - Vicarious liability - petitioner is an Independent Non-Executive Director - - the petitioner was appointed as Additional Director and resigned as...

Dishonor of Cheque - Vicarious liability of Director - The primary liability in a cheque bounce case where cheque has been issued on behalf of the company is upon the...

Dishonour of Cheque - Liability of a Director - principles of vicarious liability - petitioner had already resigned on 15.03.2014 as Director of the Company and was...

The petition challenged the criminal complaint filed against the petitioner u/s 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonor of cheque. The...

Violation of judicial discipline - The Additional Director of DRI and the adjudicating authority effectively said that the Tribunal was not correct. If it be their...

Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - Vicarious liability of directors - It is not the case of the petitioner herein that he is a non-executive director. The...

Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Director - The petitioners admit that the cheque was drawn by them and handed over to the respondent-complainant. However,...

HC ruled that a Managing Director cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for a dishonored cheque that was not drawn by their...

Authority to undertake a review contemplated under Section 67(5) of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax, 2005 - since the regular Chairman of the Tribunal is not functioning,...

Scope of Judicial Review – Review of the decision of the Settlement Commission - There is limited scope of judicial review - Despite such narrow confines of judicial...

Dishonour of Cheque - vicarious liability of director - The petitioners argued that they had resigned from their directorship well before the cheque was issued and could...

The HC affirmed the vicarious liability of the petitioner under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the NI Act for dishonored cheques. As a whole-time director and...

Personal hearing notice issued to petitioner by Assistant Director (SRO) directing appearance before Additional Director (adjudicating authority). Additional Director's...

Oppression and mismanagement - removal of MD/Director - in the notice there was an agenda for removal of 1st respondent as Managing Director and not director -...

Dishonour of Cheque - mentioning the petitioners in CRR 196 of 2016 as ‘non-directors’ and in CRR 197 of 2016 as ‘directors’ - High Court held that, at the relevant...

Quick Updates: