The removal of petitioner as Director of the company does not ...

Case Laws Companies Law

January 9, 2017

The removal of petitioner as Director of the company does not stand to judicial review. Therefore, Respondent no. 2 giving cheque power to another Director in the place of petitioner by itself cannot be canvased as one of the ground in support of the plea of mismanagement.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The removal of petitioner as Director of the company does not ...

Case Laws Companies Law

January 9, 2017

You may also like:

Jurisdiction - power of Tribunal to review its own order - Power of Review has to be granted by statute and the ‘power of Review’ is not an inherent power and therefore...

Power to Company secretary to initiate suit or any other legal proceedings in the absence of specific authorization - locus standi of the Company Secretary in the main...

Dishonor of Cheque - respondent accused was acquitted principally on the ground that the company was not properly represented - The power of attorney holder representing...

Demonetization - Scope of the term "Any" - Validity of N/N. 3407(E) dated 8th November 2016, issued by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by...

Scope of Judicial Review – Review of the decision of the Settlement Commission - There is limited scope of judicial review - Despite such narrow confines of judicial...

Qualifications for appointment of Chairperson and Members of Appellate Tribunal - Constitutional validity of Sections 9 and 32(2)(a) of the Prohibition of Benami...

Power of tribunal to review application - It is the well laid down proposition of law that ‘in the absence of any power of ‘Review’ or ‘Recall’ vested with the...

Power of Tribunal to review the judgment versus Power to re-call - Larger Bench (5 Members) decision - The judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court clearly lays down that...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - power to review v/s power to reassess - Only material relied upon by the assessing officer, in this case, is the material supplied by...

The core summary is that banks constituted as 'corresponding new banks' under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 are not covered...

Power of ITAT to review the order - a statutory authority cannot exercise power of review unless such power is expressly conferred on it. - HC

Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - valuation under Rule 11UA (2) - Even if preferential shares and equity shares are considered to be falling within the purview of Section...

Disqualification upon the petitioners for acting as Directors of Companies - Deactivation of DIN - Section 164(2) must be given only prospective operation and the...

Deemed dividend addition u/s 2(22)(e) - Since all the conditions necessary for treating the deemed dividend of the amount received in the hands of concern (which in this...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

Quick Updates: