Addition u/s 68 - Each investment has not been examined ...

Officer Fails to Justify Rejection of Evidence; No Addition Made u/s 68 Due to Lack of Examination.

January 21, 2017

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition u/s 68 - Each investment has not been examined separately. No material has been gathered by the A.O. to contradict the evidence filed by the assessee. The A.O. merely rejected the evidences without proper reason - no addition - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 68 - Each investment has not been examined ...

Officer Fails to Justify Rejection of Evidence; No Addition Made u/s 68 Due to Lack of Examination.

January 21, 2017

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite...

Validity of additions made u/s 153A, 69C, 68, and 69A of the Income Tax Act. It discusses the lack of incriminating material or documents found during the search to...

Rejection of the books of accounts - best judgment assessment u/s 144 - addition of the sales made in cash on account of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - While the...

ITAT overturned multiple additions made by AO regarding property transactions and unexplained cash receipts. On capital gains computation under s.50C, ITAT directed...

The assessment reopening u/s 147 read with Section 148 was found to be unsustainable due to the lack of independent application of mind by the Commissioner of Income Tax...

Additions u/s 68 - Any appellate authority cannot reject the evidences without any discussion or reason. The CIT (A) has not mentioned as to what more evidence were...

Addition u/s 68 - accommodation entry - additions made on the basis of retracted statements - amount received during the earlier years - assessee has furnished all the...

The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

Assessee challenged addition on account of unproved sundry creditors u/s 41(1), contending evidence of liability cessation was provided. AO held assessee failed to prove...

The addition made u/s 68 for bogus share application money receipts was solely based on the statement of an unrelated third party, Shri Pravin Kumar Jain, recorded...

Legality of the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding the gain on sale of agricultural land, based on the alleged understatement of consideration paid....

The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions u/ss 69C and 68 for undisclosed credit card expenditures in foreign currencies based on material found during a survey. The...

Addition u/s 68 cannot be made solely based on sworn statement recorded u/s 132(4) without corroborative materials. Onus lies on the Department to collect cogent...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of LTCG claimed u/s 10(38). The AO found discrepancies in off-market...

Addition u/s 68 - addition of the cash deposits in the assessee’s savings bank account - as the bank account of an assessee cannot be held to be the 'books' of an...

Quick Updates: