The Tribunal has become functus officio and has no jurisdiction ...

Tribunal Cannot Restore Appeal After Jurisdiction Ends Due to Non-Compliance with High Court's Pre-Deposit Order.

February 8, 2017

Case Laws Customs AT

The Tribunal has become functus officio and has no jurisdiction to entertain the application for restoration of appeal in view of the clear violation of the Hon’ble High Court Order to make the pre-deposit - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Tribunal has become functus officio and has no jurisdiction ...

Tribunal Cannot Restore Appeal After Jurisdiction Ends Due to Non-Compliance with High Court's Pre-Deposit Order.

February 8, 2017

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Non-compliance of pre-deposit order - dismissing the appeal for non compliance of the predeposit order cannot be faulted - HC

Waiver of pre-deposit - dismissing the appeal for non-compliance of the deposit order - Unless Section 129E is complied with, the Appellate Authority cannot proceed to...

HC addressed maintainability of GST petition where appellant sought stay on tax recovery due to non-constitution of GST Tribunal. Following legislative amendment to...

Restoration of the statutory appeal - The CESTAT had dismissed the appeal due to the petitioner's non-representation at a hearing and the failure to inform about...

The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

The petitioner is deprived of the statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order due to the non-constitution of the Tribunal u/s 112(8) and (9) of the B.G.S.T....

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside the assessment order for the assessee and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for a de novo assessment after...

Waiver of pre-deposit - requirement u/s 129E - The case revolved around the appellant's failure to fulfill the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under section 129E of...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

The order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit amount u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was challenged. The court relied on a...

Non-speaking order - It is clear that the order of Tribunal is certainly a non-speaking order and the Tribunal failed to consider the grounds raised by the appellant....

Requirement of pre-deposit towards compliance with proviso to Section 43 (5) of RERA - liability of Appellant to pay interest is not in praesenti but in future -...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Dismissal of appeal for non compliance of order for making pre-deposit - Once a consequential order is passed, the appellant would have no cause of action as against...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19...

Quick Updates: