Refund claim - effect of name change - defective return u/s ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 24, 2023

Refund claim - effect of name change - defective return u/s 139(9) or not - in whose name the refund should be issued? - PAN database correction would certainly indicate what was the original name and therefore, Petitioner’s name when it filed the return of income tax was the correct name as it then existed. Therefore, there can never be a defect and notice issued u/s 139(9) was not a valid notice. If AO had checked the database, he would have found answer and could have avoided issuing a notice. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim - effect of name change - defective return u/s ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 24, 2023

You may also like:

Claim of refund of tax paid earlier since the return was treated as Invalid by the AO - delay in rectification of return u/s 139(9) - refund cannot be allowed - HC

Enhancement of interest u/s 234A - Rectification of order u/s 154 - Defective return - The Revenue could hardly dispute that sec.139(9) of the Act is a specific...

Invalid return - Rejection of refund - mismatch in the figures of income returned and as reported in Form 26AS - Technically speaking, the AO has not passed an order u/s...

Validity of Notice issued u/s 143(2) - Defective return - Removal of defect beyond 15 days u/s 139(9) - AO should have treated the return as non-est when the assessee...

Defective return - filing of belated return to seek refund - The returns filed by the assessee was wrongly declared by the Income tax Department as invalid return u/s...

Assessment completed u/s 144 - defective return - Return filed in response to the notice issued u/s 153A it has been stated that the return filed u/s 139(1) of the Act...

Defective return - Rectification u/s 154 - the gross receipt of the assessee from the business carried out by the assessee was not more than to Rs. 1 Crore, therefore...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Rectification order u/s 154 - claim of long term capital loss - the returns filed u/s 139(5) and claim made therein in the revise return, which has no effect on the...

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

The assessee, a works contractor, filed a return in compliance with Section 153A notice and claimed deduction u/s 80IA, which was not claimed in the original return...

Rectification u/s 154 - return filled treated as inconsistent and defective u/s. 139(9) - We find the order of CIT(A) in confirming the order of AO in treating the...

Notice u/s 143(2) - period of limitation - defective return filed u/s 139(1) - upon such defects being removed, the return would relate back to the date of filing of the...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

The issue pertained to the validity of filing a revised return after the prescribed time limit. The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order, stating that after the...

Quick Updates: