Demand of differential duty - parties are related or not - loan ...

Court Rules Parties in Loan Licensee Arrangement Not Related for Differential Duty Demand.

March 2, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Demand of differential duty - parties are related or not - loan licencee arrangement - the petitioners are not concerned whether M/s. Boots makes a loss or profit in the onward sale of Betonin. They are not holding and subsidiary company - The foundation being totally weak and unsustainable in law - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Demand of differential duty - parties are related or not - loan ...

Court Rules Parties in Loan Licensee Arrangement Not Related for Differential Duty Demand.

March 2, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

A recent circular addressed the taxability of loans between related parties or affiliates. The circular clarifies that providing loans between related parties...

The Appellant, a related party unsecured financial creditor, challenged the resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the Adjudicating Authority,...

CESTAT ruled on short payment of excise duty involving related parties under Section 4(3)(b) of Central Excise Act. Company directors (siblings) held 99% shares and made...

CIRP proceedings - Financial Creditors - Related party - while the default rule under the first proviso to Section 21(2) is that only those financial creditors that are...

Liability to pay interest on the goods cleared to their sister unit in terms of proviso to Rule 9 read with Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules, 2000 - The appellant...

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

CIRP - discrimination of Related Party Financial or Operational Creditor - IBC treats related parties as a separate category for specified purposes, excluding from the...

Levy of redemption fine and penalty - provisional release of goods - the appellant paid entire amount of the differential duty along with interest thereon and 15% duty...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Demand of differential Central Excise Duty with interest and penalty - inflating freight charges through their dummy transport unit - The Tribunal affirmed the...

Liability to pay Court fees - The reasoning adopted by the appellant that it is not a case of demand of duty is basically frivolous - Once the duty is paid ‘under...

The key legal issues and holdings in this case are: 1. Valuation of clinkers transferred by the appellant to their sister concern should be done u/r 4 read with Rule 11...

The CESTAT held that interest on differential duty is a statutory liability arising from the date of removal of goods, irrespective of when the differential duty is paid....

Validity of SCN issued u/s 73 of CGST Act challenged - recovery of demand of differential tax for tax period from 1-7-2017 to 31-12-2018 - transactions related to...

The case involved a dispute over the valuation of power units supplied by one party to another, leading to a demand for differential duty, interest, and penalty. The...

Quick Updates: