Penalty - if the liability of the co-noticees arise from ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 15, 2017

Penalty - if the liability of the co-noticees arise from different act they will not get immunity from further proceeding - automatic immunity cannot be granted to the appellants who were not before the Settlement Commission - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty - if the liability of the co-noticees arise from ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 15, 2017

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

Validity of Settlement Commission order - validity of immunity granted to the assessee - Based on such disclosures and on noting that the appellant co-operated with the...

Dishonour of Cheque - Effect of arbitration proceedings - The High Court referred to a Supreme Court judgment which clarified that arbitration proceedings and...

Offence u/s 276(C)(2) and 277 - Allegation of willful tax evasion and non-payment of admitted tax - compounding application. The petitioner submitted income tax return...

Revision u/s 263 - penalty proceedings u/s 271AAB(1A) - The mandate under section 263 of the Act do not give any power to CIT to impose his satisfaction over the...

immunity from imposing penalty u/s 270AA - Penalty u/s 270A for failure to file the return of income (ITR) - Under Section 270 AA of the Income Tax Act, immunity from...

Loss of immunity from Penalty u/s. 271AAA - Delay in payment full tax as per the order of Settlement Commission (ITSC) - DR in argument mentioned that the assessee had...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Exemption u/s 11 - CIT(A) has categorically observed that no evidence had been brought on record to adduce that furnishing of inaccurate details...

Whether levy of penalty u/S 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is automatic – Imposition of penalty is not automatic. - HC

ST - Whether the penalty imposable under the Finance Act, 1994 is automatic – Held no - HC

The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

Penalty proceedings for a default committed by a deceased - legal representatives - Levy of penalty u/s 271B for non-furnishing of Tax Audit Report within the prescribed...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - just because no explanation has been offered by the assessee during the penalty proceedings the Ld. AO cannot automatically proceed to levy...

Quick Updates: