Imposition of Penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - quantum of penalty - ...

Employee's Penalty Reduced to Rs. 2.5 Lakh u/r 26 for Unknowingly Aiding Employer's Illegal Activities.

May 8, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Imposition of Penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - quantum of penalty - clandestine removal - appellant unknowingly got involved as an employee in the clandestine activity of his employers - the appellant is liable to penalty but at the same time the quantum of penalty imposed is quite high and harsh - penalty reduced to ₹ 2,50,000/- - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of Penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - quantum of penalty - ...

Employee's Penalty Reduced to Rs. 2.5 Lakh u/r 26 for Unknowingly Aiding Employer's Illegal Activities.

May 8, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

Appellant imported fermented and dried processed Sumatra cocoa beans which failed to conform to IS 8865:2003 standards as per FSSAI and BIS testing. Adjudicating...

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

Imported material diverted to unit other than permitted unit, resulting in contravention of import-export policy provisions. Goods held liable for confiscation u/s 111...

The Indian Finance Minister's upcoming FY2025-26 Budget presentation focuses on critical fiscal metrics and consolidation targets. The government aims to reduce fiscal...

The appellate tribunal examined the penalty imposed on the company and individual for contravention of Section 6(3)(a) of FEMA and Regulations 5, 6, and 13 of the...

ICAI's Suggestions for Review of Income Tax Act, 1961: Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) prosecution proceedings are appropriate only where deductors deliberately do not...

The NFRA held that the Auditors were grossly negligent and failed to exercise due diligence in the audit of a public interest entity, amounting to professional...

Levy of redemption fine and penalty - re-export of goods - misdeclaration of goods - the penalty imposed under Section 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962 is proper....

Appellate Tribunal reduced penalty imposed on company u/s 50 of FERA, 1973 from Rs.2 crores to Rs.2.5 lakhs for contravention regarding two foreign exchange remittances...

Levy of penalty in case of professional or other misconduct - minimum penalty reduced from ₹ 10 lakh rupees to 5 lakh rupees - Section 132(4) of the Companies Act, 2013

The CESTAT held that the imported betel nuts were rightly classified under CTH 0802 8030. While the minimum import price fixed by DGFT could not be treated as tariff...

Confiscation of smuggled gold bars/biscuits u/ss 111(b), 111(d), and 111(f) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellants failed to establish the licit procurement of the...

Levy of penalty- Fraudulent issuance of GDRs by the Company - the imposition of penalty upon the appellant after 12 years from date of resigning is excessive. In a large...

Levy of penalty on CHA u/s 114(i) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - acts of omission and commission in relation to the attempted illegal export of Red Sanders - So,...

Quick Updates: