Rejection of books of accounts - There cannot be negative onus ...

Court Rules Assessee Not Required to Prove Negative Onus in NSEL Dispute; No Evidence of Sham Transactions Found.

November 11, 2017

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Rejection of books of accounts - There cannot be negative onus on assessee to prove it has not made purchases from NSEL in dispute. No evidence of any sham purchases/transactions have been brought on record. No evidence of any purchase made by assessee from NSEL have been brought on record. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rejection of books of accounts - There cannot be negative onus ...

Court Rules Assessee Not Required to Prove Negative Onus in NSEL Dispute; No Evidence of Sham Transactions Found.

November 11, 2017

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credit - Onus to prove - The High court noted that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence, including bank statements, cash-flow...

Bogus sundry creditors - Whether CIT(A) had clearly violated the provisions of Rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, while admitting additional evidence? - The High...

Addition u/s 68 - unsecured loans - addition only on the basis of the information received from the Investigation Wing ignoring - the investing company has sufficient...

In a case concerning unexplained credit u/s 68, the assessee proved the identity and genuineness of share applicants, although their creditworthiness was questioned. The...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of LTCG claimed u/s 10(38). The AO found discrepancies in off-market...

Remittance from outside India - revenue v/s capital receipt - onus to prove - assessee could not discharge his onus and could not prove that the money has come out of...

Unexplained creditor u/s. 68 - onus to prove - The ITAT ruled that once the identity of the creditor and the genuineness of the transaction are established, proving the...

Once the assessee has discharged the initial onus to prove that the deduction is allowable, the onus to prove that the deduction is not admissible, shifts to the tax...

Confiscation - Smuggling of Betel Nuts - discharge of burden to prove u/s 123 of Customs Act - The betel nut is not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act, 1962...

Disallowance of commission payment - when the assessee was unable to produce evidence to prove that services were rendered by them, to whom commission were paid - the...

Addition u/s 68 as accommodation entries - long term capital gain on sale of shares as sham/bogus transaction - Mere suspicion cannot be a ground for treating the...

Suit for recovery of money on the foot of promissory note - Burden/onus to prove - The High Court found in favor of the plaintiff, overturning the decision of the...

Disallowance of sales commission paid to two Associated Enterprises (AEs) being foreign entities - assessee failed to discharge the onus of proving legitimate business...

The ITAT reversed additions made by the AO under Section 69C based on entries in a seized diary, finding that the assessee had discharged the primary onus by denying the...

Plaintiff filed suit for recovery of money. Defendant failed to rebut presumption u/s 118 of Negotiable Instruments Act by not proving lack of consideration through...

Quick Updates: