Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - willful evasion of tax by claiming ...

No Penalty Imposed for Bona Fide Mistake in Claiming Depreciation u/s 271(1)(c) for Tax Evasion.

February 7, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - willful evasion of tax by claiming deprecation on building - This is a bonafide mistake made by the assessee without any intention to evade tax. - no penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - willful evasion of tax by claiming ...

No Penalty Imposed for Bona Fide Mistake in Claiming Depreciation u/s 271(1)(c) for Tax Evasion.

February 7, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for disallowance of depreciation. The ITAT held that the assessee did not deliberately claim depreciation with an...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for excess deduction claimed u/s 10B. The assessee furnished all relevant facts for computing total income, and provided detailed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - tax was paid on the income assessed u/s 115JB - the concealment did not lead to tax evasion at all penalty u/s 271(1)(c) could not be imposed in...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - bona fide or mala fide with an intention to evade taxes - not exigible to levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act where the...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - If authority is satisfied that there was a reasonable cause, it may impose any penalty but inadvertent mistake cannot call for penalty in the...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – In the garb of the bona fide claim an assessee cannot escape levy of penalty - Onus was not on the AO to prove the negative - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim of deduction under Section 35CCA - penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was rightly imposed - HC

Quick Updates: