Penalty u/s 76 and section 78 - the proceedings itself should ...

Case Laws Service Tax

March 28, 2018

Penalty u/s 76 and section 78 - the proceedings itself should have closed under Section 73 (3) as the service tax liability alongwith interest has been discharged prior to issue of show cause notice - penalty set aside. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 76 and section 78 - the proceedings itself should ...

Case Laws Service Tax

March 28, 2018

You may also like:

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

The case pertains to the levy of service tax under the reverse charge mechanism (RCM) on rental payments made by a company to its directors for renting immovable...

Adjustment of advance of service tax was paid but had not been shown in the ST-3 Return as advances and not been adjusted subsequently - Under Rule 6 of the Service Tax...

Eligibility to make adjustment of excess service tax paid against future service tax liability - Claim of Excess service tax paid due to issuance of revised invoice -...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Offence u/s 276(C)(2) and 277 - Allegation of willful tax evasion and non-payment of admitted tax - compounding application. The petitioner submitted income tax return...

Self Adjustment of excess service tax paid with the service tax liabilities for subsequent period - Service tax amount paid at higher rate for the service tax...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

The Department initiated the case based on income tax documents, which were public documents, and the presumption is on their truthfulness. The difference in value based...

Once a service is subjected to service tax, the same service cannot be taxed again, as it would amount to double taxation, which is impermissible. In this case, even...

Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - goods detained on the ground that the goods were being transported on a vehicle different from...

Service tax liability cannot be imposed twice on the same transaction. The appellant, as a service recipient, was required to pay 75% of the service tax under the...

Levy of penalty - payment of service tax and interest before issuance of SCN - Sub-section 3 of section 73 of the Act, prohibits initiation of proceedings for recovery...

The services provided by the appellant, a referral service for Canadian banks and foreign universities, were examined to determine whether they constituted 'Export of...

Key aspects of the telecommunication service provided by the appellants and the related service tax implications. It discusses whether the services were provided with or...

Quick Updates: