Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2018 Year 2018 This

Misappropriation of duty free goods - The appellant have not ...


Appellant Cleared of Duty-Free Fraud Allegations; Section 114A Penalty Not Applicable Due to Lack of Involvement.

June 20, 2018

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Misappropriation of duty free goods - The appellant have not involved themselves in sale or diversion of goods. In fact they have themselves been a victim of a fraud. In these circumstances, the allegation of suppression, misdeclaration etc. to invoke extended period of limitation cannot be sustained - the penal provision under Section 114A cannot be sustained.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The case before CESTAT New Delhi involved fraudulent registration and utilization of duty-free scrips, leading to penalties. The appellant failed to comply with...

  2. Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

  3. Customs Act, 1962 - Penalty levied on appellant as co-noticee for principal violator's diversion of duty-free imported goods under DEEC scheme to local market without...

  4. Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

  5. Appellant, a proprietary firm, was levied penalty for involvement in illegality by not receiving goods and receiving invoices only with intention to avail CENVAT credit...

  6. Levy of Special Excise duty - Air Conditioners and parts - case of the department is that the goods which have been cleared by the appellant are having essential...

  7. CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

  8. 100% EOU - demand of duty - grey fabrics manufactured cleared to DTA units - appellant obtained raw materials duty free i.e. without payment of duty removed...

  9. DFIA scheme - exemption from basic customs duty and additional customs duty - introduction of new condition by way of amendment - The tribunal held that, the amendment...

  10. The appellants, a customs warehousing station, faced a fire incident resulting in the loss of certain goods. The customs duty amount on the lost goods was paid by the...

  11. 100% EOU - demand of customs duty on the raw material imported duty free - removal of finished goods in DTA without having any permission from the Development...

  12. Levy of penalty u/s 25(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - evasion of duty - The imposition of penalty on both the appellants is un-called for - since Appellant No.1,...

  13. Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

  14. Benefit of reduced penalty of 15% u/s 28(5) - Delay in payment of penalty due to Public Holiday - The appellant voluntarily paid the differential BCD and interest upon...

  15. Penalty levied u/s 112(b) of Customs Act challenged due to lack of proper evidence. Appellant obtained PNR movement documents from steamer agent for cargo movement from...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates