Deduction u/s. 54 - CIT(Appeals) as an appellate authority ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 4, 2018

Deduction u/s. 54 - CIT(Appeals) as an appellate authority cannot deny the benefit of deduction - If the assessee is entitled to deduction while computing the long term capital gain, that cannot be denied on the ground that such a claim was not before the AO

View Source

← Previous Next →

Deduction u/s. 54 - CIT(Appeals) as an appellate authority ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 4, 2018

You may also like:

Rejection of Revision application u/s 264 - Exemption u/s 11 denied to assessee - benefits denied merely on the ground that the donor has deducted TDS u/s 194C and 194J...

Principles of Natural justice - late filing of return - intent to evade or not - it is the case of petitioner is that various aspects have not been dealt with or...

Classification of goods - Multi Function Printers - It could not be said gainsaid that this notification has to be given prospective effect. - These aspects though have...

The subordinate authority is not empowered to supersede the orders passed by the appellate authority and an administrative discipline requires that the subordinate...

Denial of deduction u/s 80IB(8A) - CIT(A) cannot override the approval/renewal granted by the prescribed authority and deny the benefit to the assessee - AT

TP Adjustment - benefit test - authorities below have fatally erred in applying the benefit test as rightly contended by the Ld. Counsel of the assessee. Furthermore, it...

Condonation of delay in filing an appeal before the appellate authority - Applicability of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 - Power and Jurisdiction of appellate...

LTCG - Benefit of deduction u/s. 54 denied - CIT(Appeals) has gone by the fact that there was absence of Occupation Certificate but this will not be a ground to deny the...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

Karnataka VAT - Effect of Conversion of partnership firm into joint stock company - Carry forward deduction of unabsorbed contractor payments - the adjudicating...

The High Court held that the Revisional Authority did not follow the proper procedure prescribed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act while invoking its revisionary powers. The...

Petitioner paid IGST but respondent did not take benefit of ITC. Dispute not settled. Appellate authority to consider grievance regarding payment of penalty and interest...

Disbursal of refund amount - action of withholding of the petitioner/assessee’s claim of refund in question by the respondent CGST authority and not refunding the same...

Respondents made a concession before the Regulatory Authority to accept interest only on amounts paid after RERA implementation. However, before the Appellate Authority,...

Clandestine manufacture and recovery of Central Excise Duty along with interest and penalty - suppression of facts and misrepresentation alleged against petitioner -...

Quick Updates: