The impugned assessment order though stated as an order under ...

Assessment Order Fails to Follow Dispute Resolution Panel Directions, Appeals Allowed u/s 143(3) to Commissioner (Appeals.

September 5, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax HC

The impugned assessment order though stated as an order under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) is not an order in pursuance of the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel, but an order of assessment simplicitor under Section 143(3) from which an appeal would lie to the Commissioner (Appeals).

View Source

← Previous Next →

The impugned assessment order though stated as an order under ...

Assessment Order Fails to Follow Dispute Resolution Panel Directions, Appeals Allowed u/s 143(3) to Commissioner (Appeals.

September 5, 2018

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Income–tax (Dispute Resolution Panel) (First Amendment) Rules, 2018

Dispute Resolution Panel - Reference to - Reconstitution of DRP at Mumbai - 1 - Order-Instruction

The ITAT held that the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) lacks jurisdiction to direct the Transfer Pricing Officer or Assessing Officer in second-round proceedings after...

Final assessment order passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) subsequent to Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP)/Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) directions deemed invalid...

Power of DRP to enhance the assessment u/s 144C(5) - The Dispute Resolution Panel being an Expert Panel, is bound to ascertain the correctness or otherwise of the Draft...

Transfer pricing officer (TPO) erred by considering non-associated enterprise (non-AE) revenue and costs while computing transfer pricing (TP) adjustment, contrary to...

Validity of approval of Resolution Plan - It is submitted that Adjudicating Authority while approving the Resolution Plan has erroneously directed that Excluded...

The High Court ruled on the validity of an order passed u/s 144C(3) read with Section 144B. The petitioner had filed objections to the Draft Assessment Order before the...

Advance tax payment obligation does not apply when assessee claims agricultural land sale proceeds are exempt u/s 2(14). CIT(Appeals) should admit appeal for...

The Tribunal held that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was barred by limitation and quashed it. As per Section 144C(13) read with Section 143(3),...

Eligibility under the DTVSV Scheme - appeals against the orders passed u/s 143(1)(a)(i) or (ii) as a separate category from the appeals from Clauses (iii) to (vi) of...

TP - The findings or the premise taken by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) in the subsequent year does not render the findings in the previous years per se illegal or...

TPA - the assessee cannot seek to raise an issue before the Tribunal in respect of which he has not filed any objection before the Dispute Resolution Panel nor has the...

Validity of the final assessment order due to non-service of the Dispute Resolution Panel’s (DRP) directions - AR candidly admitted before the Tribunal that, on the...

The ITAT rejected the Revenue's appeal and held that the penalty u/s 271G was not exigible. The ITAT relied on the Bombay High Court's decision in Undercarriage and...

Quick Updates: