The ITAT rejected the Revenue's appeal and held that the penalty ...

ITAT Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Rules Section 271G Penalty Inapplicable Based on Bombay High Court Precedent.

January 9, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT rejected the Revenue's appeal and held that the penalty u/s 271G was not exigible. The ITAT relied on the Bombay High Court's decision in Undercarriage and Tractor Parts (P.) Ltd. Vs. Dispute Resolution Panel, wherein the High Court had quashed the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) read with section 144C(13). The ITAT observed that the CIT(A) had failed to consider this High Court decision while allowing the assessee's penalty appeal. Since the Revenue did not bring any contrary decision of a Higher Forum, the ITAT held that the impugned penalty was not leviable and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT rejected the Revenue's appeal and held that the penalty ...

ITAT Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Rules Section 271G Penalty Inapplicable Based on Bombay High Court Precedent.

January 9, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT dismissed assessee's appeal citing low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No.3/2018, giving Revenue liberty to recall dismissal if covered by exceptions. Assessee...

The assessee delayed filing an appeal against an order dismissing their appeal contesting the assessment u/s 143(3), resulting in a 346-day delay. The ITAT held that...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) levied pursuant to order passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 263 was challenged before ITAT, Jaipur Bench. ITAT quashed the order of Principal...

The High Court held that prosecution u/ss 276C, 277, 278B, and 278E for tax evasion was invalid as it violated CBDT guidelines. Prosecution was premature without the...

The ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal, holding that penalty under s.271G for failure to furnish transfer pricing documentation cannot be levied against the German resident...

ITAT set aside penalty under s271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act following deletion of quantum addition in earlier proceedings. The underlying dispute involved classification...

ITAT ruled AMP expenses did not constitute international transaction under Section 92B, as Revenue failed to establish existence of arrangement between assessee and AE...

ITAT dismissed an appeal solely on account of non-appearance of the appellant - the first application aforesaid of the petitioner, filed in or about March, 2017, for...

The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's quantum appeal. It upheld the CIT(A)'s finding that the unexplained cash found during search was part of the income surrendered by the...

The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision,...

AO imposed penalty under s.270A for unsubstantiated business expenses including advertising, development, land, and excavation charges, which were disallowed from...

The ITAT Mumbai considered a case involving a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found the...

Assessee made repayments of loans/deposits through modes other than account payee cheques/drafts, violating Section 269T. Penalty u/s 271E was imposed. ITAT bifurcated...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Quick Updates: