Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2025 Year 2025 This

The ITAT rejected the Revenue's appeal and held that the penalty ...


Furnishing of documents and information u/s 92D(3): ITAT Rejects Penalty u/s 271G Following Bombay HC Precedent.

January 9, 2025

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The ITAT rejected the Revenue's appeal and held that the penalty u/s 271G was not exigible. The ITAT relied on the Bombay High Court's decision in Undercarriage and Tractor Parts (P.) Ltd. Vs. Dispute Resolution Panel, wherein the High Court had quashed the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) read with section 144C(13). The ITAT observed that the CIT(A) had failed to consider this High Court decision while allowing the assessee's penalty appeal. Since the Revenue did not bring any contrary decision of a Higher Forum, the ITAT held that the impugned penalty was not leviable and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty under section 271G of the Income tax Act – TPA - failure to furnish information and documents required by an Assessing Officer under Section 92D - The...

  2. The case pertains to the levy of penalty u/s 271G for failure to furnish documents and information u/ss 92CA/92D. The key points are: The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)...

  3. Penalty imposed u/s 271G - failure to furnish the information/documents required u/s 92D(1) r/w rule 10D - when the TPO has accepted the benchmarking of the assessee,...

  4. Penalty u/s. 271G - assessee did not provide any basis for comparing the transactions and it failed to provide any alternative method to benchmark the transactions which...

  5. Amendment of section 271AA. - penalty for failure to keep and maintain information and document, etc., in respect of certain transactions - if any person being...

  6. Penalty under section 271AA - failure to furnish the information or documents u/s 92D - assessee made the sufficient compliance for maintaining the record as required...

  7. Penalty u/s 271FA – Protection u/s 273B - Proper information not furnished by assessee – delay in furnishing the requisite AIR information by the appellant - bonafide...

  8. Penalty u/s 271G - assessee applied TNMM for determining of ALP - information/documents sought for determining of ALP as per CUP method - the difficulty in maintaining...

  9. Penalty u/s 271G - non-furnishing’ TP Study Report’ which is not a specified document under Rule 10D - penalty deleted - AT

  10. Penalty u/s 271G - assessee failed to furnish documents as required under the Rule 10D(1) in respect of the international transactions - considering the reasonable cause...

  11. Levy a penalty u/s 271G - default of non-submission of documents within stipulated period as required u/s 92D(3) - Though there is a delay on the part of the assessee to...

  12. Penalty u/s 271G – Failure to maintain documents and accounts being audited - AO should have initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271AA/271BA – the penalty levied u/s 271G...

  13. Penalty u/s 271G - failure to furnish documentation as required under the Rule 10D(1) and Section 92D(3) - the assessee had substantially complied with the directions of...

  14. Penalty u/s 271AA - failure of the assessee to report the intentional transactions - As seen that the AO wrongly applied the amended Section 271AA which is effective...

  15. Penalty u/s 271G - assessee failed to keep and maintain any information as per the provisions of section 92D - The order of authorities below is conspicuous inasmuch as...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates