No business activity had been carried out during the relevant ...

Entity Denied Business Expense Deduction Due to Lack of Activity u/s 71(1) of Income Tax Act.

July 4, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax AT

No business activity had been carried out during the relevant previous year - not entitled to a set off of the administrative expenditure incurred as business expenses u/s 71(1) of the Act - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

No business activity had been carried out during the relevant ...

Entity Denied Business Expense Deduction Due to Lack of Activity u/s 71(1) of Income Tax Act.

July 4, 2012

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The appellant trust claimed to be formed for public charitable activities and registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act 1959, regularly filing its income tax...

The assessee, engaged in the business of shares and securities, claimed administration expenses, including Portfolio Management Service (PMS) expenses, against capital...

Charitable activities or not - GST on the amounts received in the form of Donation / Grants from various entities including Central Government and State Government - the...

Assessee voluntarily declared income under "income from other sources" in return. AO disallowed deduction claimed for coordination and settlement expenses due to lack of...

Disallowance of finance costs - proof of business expenses - Share in Joint Venture (JV) - Since assessee is not carrying on any business activity on its own, the...

Expenses under the head research and development - deduction of such expenses under the provisions of section 37(1) OR u/s 35 - the genuineness of the expenses cannot be...

Proposed amendment enables recovery of existing liabilities under Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 from seized assets...

The ITAT held that the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) circulars are binding on the Income Tax Authorities. The Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the taxability of income from a discretionary trust u/s 164(1) read with clause (ii) of Explanation 1 to Section 164 of...

The HC upheld the assessee's methodology for computing deduction under Section 36(1)(viii) of the I.T. Act. Since the assessee's accounts did not segregate actual...

Proper officer - Validity of issue of Authorization for access to Business premises issued u/s 71(1) - the Proper Officer for the functions referred to Section 71(1) of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Denial of claim of loss or to categorize certain expenses as pre-operative expenses - commencement of business during the year - assessee’s business was ‘set up’ or not...

Loss from other source [wrongly shown as interest] and set off u/s.71 - assessee had opted for the deeming provision contemplated u/s.44AD of the Act but had separately...

Deduction u/s 80P - return of income was not filed within the due date prescribed u/s 139(1) - looking into the totality of facts, we are of the view that claim of...

Quick Updates: