Penalty u/s 271FA - assessee responded to the notice by ...

Penalty u/s 271FA Deemed Unjustified for Assessee Due to Absence of Reportable Transactions in AIR Filing.

February 1, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271FA - assessee responded to the notice by furnishing the ‘Nil’ transactions - in the absence of reportable transaction, the assessee is not obliged to file the AIR and levy of penalty u/s 271FA is unjustified.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271FA - assessee responded to the notice by ...

Penalty u/s 271FA Deemed Unjustified for Assessee Due to Absence of Reportable Transactions in AIR Filing.

February 1, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT Delhi ruled on penalty u/s 271FA for non-filing of return/Statement of Financial Transaction (SFT) u/s 285BA(1). Assessee reported no reportable transactions in...

Penalty u/s 271FA - Appellant failed to file the SFT [Statement of Financial Transaction] by due date - no malafides could be attributed to assessee so as to invoke...

Penalty levied u/s 271FA for delay in filing Statement of Financial Transactions (SFT) was challenged. The assessee delayed 255 days in complying with Section 285BA,...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271FA - late filing of the SFT statement Online by the appellant - appellant opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and paid the due amount - Form...

The ITAT held that the assessee failed to provide a satisfactory explanation regarding unexplained loan transactions/advances to a director. The AO made an addition to...

The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalty was initiated u/s. 271DA instead of u/s. 271D, which led to confusion and violated the assessee's right to a fair hearing....

The Appellate Tribunal held that the penalty u/s 271FA for delay in filing the Statement of Financial Transaction (SFT) without reasonable cause was justified. The SFT...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Penalty for failure to furnish annual information return - no appeal is provided under the Act against the penalty levied under section 271FA of the Act. Hence, the...

The assessee had not obtained and furnished the Audit Report from the Accountant within the due date. The Tribunal held that the levy of penalty u/s 271B is not...

Penalty u/s 271FA - delay of 561 days in furnishing AIR u/s 285BA - No mala fides can be attributed to the assessee so as to invoke the penalty proceedings under section...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of an order passed u/s 143(3) by the Assessing Officer (AO), which was revised by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax...

Quick Updates: