Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - addition sustain on Bogus purchases - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 2, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - addition sustain on Bogus purchases - When it is not discernible from the assessment order as to whether assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars of income or has concealed particulars of income so as to apply the deeming provisions contained under Explanation1 (A) & 1(B) of the Act, the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is not sustainable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - addition sustain on Bogus purchases - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 2, 2019

You may also like:

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed two key issues in the case. Firstly, regarding the penalty u/s 271(1)(c), the tribunal held that the absence of a tick mark on the notice did...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Addition of bogus purchases - Tribunal in quantum proceedings reduced to 12.5% of such purchases - since income has been estimated by applying a...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Addition u/s 68 - Head changed from income under “PGBP” (as shown by the assessee) to addition U/s 68 - That there was some tax sought to be...

The Appellate Tribunal held that despite the addition u/s 69B of the Income Tax Act being justified, the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be levied due to ambiguity...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - property dealer - addition on account of cash retained - The facts of the case may justify the addition in the quantum case, but the parameters...

Addition u/s 68 - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - concealment of particulars - unexplained cash credit / bogus purchases - At the time of assessment, the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Estimation of income on bogus purchases - Once the quantitative details of purchases and the corresponding quantitative sales have not been...

Quick Updates: