Addition u/s 69B for unexplained investment - consideration in ...

Court Rejects Unexplained Investment Claim u/s 69B Due to Lack of Evidence Beyond Sale Deed Payment.

May 2, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition u/s 69B for unexplained investment - consideration in sale deed vs consideration in agreement to sale - During the course of search, no evidence was found other than payment mentioned in sale seed - assessee has been able to prove that agreement to sell have not been acted upon between the parties - no addition based on agreement to sale

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 69B for unexplained investment - consideration in ...

Court Rejects Unexplained Investment Claim u/s 69B Due to Lack of Evidence Beyond Sale Deed Payment.

May 2, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

In the case at hand, the workmen's claims for wages and other dues were rejected by the liquidator due to lack of evidence substantiating their employment on the date of...

The High Court rejected the appeal filed by the applicant due to lack of reasons for enhancing turnover, non-consideration of material evidence, and failure to obtain...

Sum advanced to sister concern by cheques drawn – Unexplained investment or not - it has been rightly treated as unexplained investment in terms of Section 69B of the...

Validity of reopening of the case u/s. 147 - Reasons to believe - addition as unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 against sale of shares / investments along with share...

ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal concerning unexplained money under s.69A, rejecting additions based on difference between agreement to sale and final sale deed values....

Assessment u/s 153A - unexplained investment in Hotel Building - addition under sec 69 r.w.s. 115BBE - reliance on DVO report post-search - Held, DVO report...

The ITAT Jodhpur allowed admission of additional evidence u/r 46A of IT Rules by CIT(A) to delete addition on merits. The tribunal found merit in the evidence provided...

Unexplained cash credits u/s 68 and the applicability of Section 115BBE for taxing such additions. The key points are: The Assessing Officer (AO) issued notices u/s...

Seizure of tobacco and loss of the same due to file - Liability of central excise department - Whether the Trial Court has committed error of facts and law in passing...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

Condonation of delay beyond condonable period - appeal rejected on the sole ground that the appeal filed by the appellant is beyond the condonable period i.e., 56 days -...

Undervaluation of imported goods - Patchouli Oil - The CESTAT found that the rejection of the declared value lacked legal basis and was unsupported by evidence. The...

The assessee university's application for registration u/s 10(23C)(vi) was rejected due to non-submission of audited accounts and failure to provide necessary...

Refund of claim - Claim filed beyond period of 1 year - Export - Notification No. 17/2009 - all conditions are mandatory - refund claim filed beyond one year rejected - AT

The ITAT held: Long term capital gain was to be computed allowing deduction for indexed cost of acquisition and exemption u/s 54B. Addition u/s 68 for unexplained...

Quick Updates: