Levy of penalty - mis-declaration made by the exporter - goods ...

Exporter Penalty Overturned Due to Lack of Claim on Mis-Declared Goods; Confiscation Not Contested or Addressed.

December 2, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

Levy of penalty - mis-declaration made by the exporter - goods remained as unclaimed for almost two years - Since appellant had not placed any claim over the imported goods, no finding is required to be given on the confiscation order and its redemption upon payment of fine at this stage which is not under challenge in the forum by the claimants - Levy of penalty set aside.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty - mis-declaration made by the exporter - goods ...

Exporter Penalty Overturned Due to Lack of Claim on Mis-Declared Goods; Confiscation Not Contested or Addressed.

December 2, 2019

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Confiscation - fine - penalty - Mis-declaring the quantity of cigarettes imported under warehouse bill of entry for re-export purpose - The customs authorities...

The case pertains to a duty drawback claim where the exporter (appellant) allegedly misdeclared the export goods, leading to an excess drawback claim of Rs 20,394/-. The...

Penalty - Confiscation of the goods – Merely because the appellant had claimed a wrong classification, it cannot be held that the appellant has mis-declared the goods - AT

Confiscation of export goods set aside by Appellate Tribunal. Exporter's explanation accepted regarding mismatch between goods and invoice. No deliberate mis-declaration...

Confiscation of goods - Redemption fine - Imposition of penalty - Valuation dispute - The case involved the importation of machinery where the foreign supplier...

Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - Since the appellants deliberately suppressed the value by mis-declaring, the goods were liable for confiscation. - AT

Imposition of penalties u/s 114 (iii) and 114A on employees / manager of CHA - benami shipping bills - The Tribunal found that the appellant knowingly filed benami...

Confiscation - redemption fine - penalty - Classification of imported goods - Aluminium Profile - It is not the case of Revenue that the appellants had mis-declared the...

In the case before CESTAT Bangalore, the issue revolved around mis-declaration of import value, duty demand, confiscation of goods, and penalty imposition. The...

Valuation of export goods - rejection of declared value - claim of duty drawback wrongfully - the said concealment was nothing but an afterthought to cover up the...

Re-classification of Thorn - The Tribunal upheld the reclassification of the imported goods to CTI 76020090, agreeing with the authorities that the original...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Levy of penalty - The appellant had, undisputedly, mis-declared the quantity of the goods imported in the Bill of Entry dated 9.2.2010. - Further, in respect of four of...

The CESTAT held that Section 28AAA of the Customs Act, 1962, invoked by the Revenue for recovery of duty foregone, requires establishing collusion, willful...

Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

Quick Updates: